CMaP-SAM: Contraction Mapping Prior for SAM-driven Few-shot Segmentation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Few-shot segmentation (FSS) aims to segment new classes using few annotated images. While recent FSS methods have shown considerable improvements by leveraging Segment Anything Model (SAM), they face two critical limitations: insufficient utilization of structural correlations in query images, and significant information loss when converting continuous position priors to discrete point prompts. To address these challenges, we propose CMaP-SAM, a novel framework that introduces contraction mapping theory to optimize position priors for SAM-driven few-shot segmentation. CMaP-SAM consists of three key components: (1) a contraction mapping module that formulates position prior optimization as a Banach contraction mapping with convergence guarantees. This module iteratively refines position priors through pixel-wise structural similarity, generating a converged prior that preserves both semantic guidance from reference images and structural correlations in query images; (2) an adaptive distribution alignment module bridging continuous priors with SAM's binary mask prompt encoder; and (3) a foreground-background decoupled refinement architecture producing accurate final segmentation masks. Extensive experiments demonstrate CMaP-SAM's effectiveness, achieving state-of-the-art performance with 71.1 mIoU on PASCAL-5i and 56.1 on COCO-20i datasets. Code is available at https://github.com/Chenfan0206/CMaP-SAM.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Apr 2025.
Builds on
25 of 35 references.
References · 25
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
- 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
- 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameterscited by 1,928
- 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,739
- 2023Encouraging Divergent Thinking in Large Language Models through Multi-Agent Debatecited by 995
- 2021Did Aristotle Use a Laptop? A Question Answering Benchmark with Implicit Reasoning Strategiescited by 736
- 2023ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent Debatecited by 724
- 2025Multi-Agent Collaboration Mechanisms: A Survey of LLMscited by 424
- 2024Mixture-of-Agents Enhances Large Language Model Capabilitiescited by 420
- 2023ReConcile: Round-Table Conference Improves Reasoning via Consensus among Diverse LLMscited by 297
13 more
- 2023A Dynamic LLM-Powered Agent Network for Task-Oriented Agent Collaborationcited by 281
- 2023MuSR: Testing the Limits of Chain-of-thought with Multistep Soft Reasoningcited by 195
- 2024Rethinking the Bounds of LLM Reasoning: Are Multi-Agent Discussions the Key?cited by 153
- 2025Confidence Improves Self-Consistency in LLMscited by 111
- 2023Mindstorms in Natural Language-Based Societies of Mindcited by 105
- 2024Improving Multi-Agent Debate with Sparse Communication Topologycited by 103
- 2023Examining Inter-Consistency of Large Language Models Collaboration: An In-depth Analysis via Debatecited by 94
- 2023Exchange-of-Thought: Enhancing Large Language Model Capabilities through Cross-Model Communicationcited by 78
- 2023A Bibliometric Review of Large Language Models Research from 2017 to 2023cited by 56
- 2025Rethinking Mixture-of-Agents: Is Mixing Different Large Language Models Beneficial?cited by 52
- 2024Counterfactual Debating with Preset Stances for Hallucination Elimination of LLMscited by 17
- 2025CER: Confidence Enhanced Reasoning in LLMscited by 16
- 2024Efficient Multi-Agent Collaboration with Tool Use for Online Planning in Complex Table Question Answeringcited by 13
Built on by
Not cited yet.