Cramer-Rao Bounds for Laplacian Matrix Estimation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this paper, we analyze the performance of the estimation of Laplacian matrices under general observation models. Laplacian matrix estimation involves structural constraints, including symmetry and null-space properties, along with matrix sparsity. By exploiting a linear reparametrization that enforces the structural constraints, we derive closed-form matrix expressions for the Cramer-Rao Bound (CRB) specifically tailored to Laplacian matrix estimation. We further extend the derivation to the sparsity-constrained case, introducing two oracle CRBs that incorporate prior information of the support set, i.e. the locations of the nonzero entries in the Laplacian matrix. We examine the properties and order relations between the bounds, and provide the associated Slepian-Bangs formula for the Gaussian case. We demonstrate the use of the new CRBs in three representative applications: (i) topology identification in power systems, (ii) graph filter identification in diffused models, and (iii) precision matrix estimation in Gaussian Markov random fields under Laplacian constraints. The CRBs are evaluated and compared with the mean-squared-errors (MSEs) of the constrained maximum likelihood estimator (CMLE), which integrates both equality and inequality constraints along with sparsity constraints, and of the oracle CMLE, which knows the locations of the nonzero entries of the Laplacian matrix. We perform this analysis for the applications of power system topology identification and graphical LASSO, and demonstrate that the MSEs of the estimators converge to the CRB and oracle CRB, given a sufficient number of measurements.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Apr 2025.
Builds on
20 of 66 references.
References · 20
- 2016How to learn a graph from smooth signalscited by 146
- 2013Discrete Signal Processing on Graphs: Frequency Analysiscited by 72
- 2016Network Topology Inference from Spectral Templatescited by 58
- 2022Graph Filters for Signal Processing and Machine Learning on Graphscited by 53
- 2020A User Guide to Low-Pass Graph Signal Processing and its Applicationscited by 25
- 2016Learning Sparse Graphs Under Smoothness Priorcited by 22
- 2020Algorithms for Learning Graphs in Financial Marketscited by 14
- 2018Identifying the Topology of Undirected Networks from Diffused Non-stationary Graph Signalscited by 12
- 2018Detection of false data injection attacks in smart grids based on graph signal processingcited by 12
- 2021Grid-Graph Signal Processing (Grid-GSP): A Graph Signal Processing Framework for the Power Gridcited by 12
- 2013Monitoring and Optimization for Power Grids: A Signal Processing Perspectivecited by 9
- 2021Bayesian Estimation of Graph Signalscited by 9
8 more
- 2021Detecting Central Nodes from Low-rank Excited Graph Signals via Structured Factor Analysiscited by 9
- 2016Graph Learning from Data under Structural and Laplacian Constraintscited by 8
- 2023Verifying the Smoothness of Graph Signals: A Graph Signal Processing Approachcited by 6
- 2017Exact Topology and Parameter Estimation in Distribution Grids with Minimal Observabilitycited by 3
- 2021Topology and Admittance Estimation: Precision Limits and Algorithmscited by 2
- 2023Estimation of Complex Valued Laplacian Matrices for Topology Identification in Power Systemscited by 2
- 2023Protection Against Graph-Based False Data Injection Attacks on Power Systemscited by 1
- 2025Efficient Sampling Allocation Strategies for General Graph-Filter-Based Signal Recoverycited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.