Detection of false data injection attacks in smart grids based on graph signal processing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The smart grid combines the classical power system with information technology, leading to a cyber-physical system. In such an environment the malicious injection of data has the potential to cause severe consequences. Classical residual-based methods for bad data detection are unable to detect well designed false data injection (FDI) attacks. Moreover, most work on FDI attack detection is based on the linearized DC model of the power system and fails to detect attacks based on the AC model. The aim of this paper is to address these problems by using the graph structure of the grid and the AC power flow model. We derive an attack detection method that is able to detect previously undetectable FDI attacks. This method is based on concepts originating from graph signal processing (GSP). The proposed detection scheme calculates the graph Fourier transform of an estimated grid state and filters the graph's high-frequency components. By comparing the maximum norm of this outcome with a threshold we can detect the presence of FDI attacks. Case studies on the IEEE 14-bus system demonstrate that the proposed method is able to detect a wide range of previously undetectable attacks, both on angles and on magnitudes of the voltages.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 11 Oct 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 4; 2025: 1.
12 papers.
- 2021Graph Neural Networks Based Detection of Stealth False Data Injection Attacks in Smart Gridscited by 24
- 2023GSP-KalmanNet: Tracking Graph Signals via Neural-Aided Kalman Filteringcited by 10
- 2021Cyberattack Detection in Large-Scale Smart Grids using Chebyshev Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 8
- 2022A Temporal Graph Neural Network for Cyber Attack Detection and Localization in Smart Gridscited by 7
- 2021False Data Injection Threats in Active Distribution Systems: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 5
- 2023Efficient Graph Laplacian Estimation by Proximal Newtoncited by 4
- 2024A Comprehensive Survey on the Security of Smart Grid: Challenges, Mitigations, and Future Research Opportunitiescited by 4
- 2023Federated Learning Based Distributed Localization of False Data Injection Attacks on Smart Gridscited by 2
- 2024Detection of False Data Injection Attacks (FDIA) on Power Dynamical Systems With a State Prediction Methodcited by 2
- 2024Learning Graph Filters for Structure-Function Coupling based Hub Node Identificationcited by 1
- 2024Online Planning of Power Flows for Power Systems Against Bushfires Using Spatial Contextcited by 0
- 2025Cramer-Rao Bounds for Laplacian Matrix Estimationcited by 0
- 2025Cramer-Rao Bounds for Laplacian Matrix Estimation6 Apr 2025
- 2024Learning Graph Filters for Structure-Function Coupling based Hub Node Identification22 Oct 2024
- 2024Detection of False Data Injection Attacks (FDIA) on Power Dynamical Systems With a State Prediction Method6 Sep 2024
- 2024A Comprehensive Survey on the Security of Smart Grid: Challenges, Mitigations, and Future Research Opportunities10 Jul 2024
- 2024Online Planning of Power Flows for Power Systems Against Bushfires Using Spatial Context20 Apr 2024
- 2023GSP-KalmanNet: Tracking Graph Signals via Neural-Aided Kalman Filtering28 Nov 2023
- 2023Federated Learning Based Distributed Localization of False Data Injection Attacks on Smart Grids17 Jun 2023
- 2023Efficient Graph Laplacian Estimation by Proximal Newton13 Feb 2023
- 2022A Temporal Graph Neural Network for Cyber Attack Detection and Localization in Smart Grids7 Dec 2022
- 2021Cyberattack Detection in Large-Scale Smart Grids using Chebyshev Graph Convolutional Networks25 Dec 2021
- 2021False Data Injection Threats in Active Distribution Systems: A Comprehensive Survey28 Nov 2021
- 2021Graph Neural Networks Based Detection of Stealth False Data Injection Attacks in Smart Grids5 Apr 2021