Language Models at the Syntax-Semantics Interface: A Case Study of the Long-Distance Binding of Chinese Reflexive ziji
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper explores whether language models can effectively resolve the complex binding patterns of the Mandarin Chinese reflexive ziji, which are constrained by both syntactic and semantic factors. We construct a dataset of 240 synthetic sentences using templates and examples from syntactic literature, along with 320 natural sentences from the BCC corpus. Evaluating 21 language models against this dataset and comparing their performance to judgments from native Mandarin speakers, we find that none of the models consistently replicates human-like judgments. The results indicate that existing language models tend to rely heavily on sequential cues, though not always favoring the closest strings, and often overlooking subtle semantic and syntactic constraints. They tend to be more sensitive to noun-related than verb-related semantics.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Apr 2025.
Builds on
26 of 68 references.
References · 26
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,935
- 2020mT5: A massively multilingual pre-trained text-to-text transformercited by 1,818
- 2019BERT Rediscovers the Classical NLP Pipelinecited by 1,059
- 2019Analyzing Multi-Head Self-Attention: Specialized Heads Do the Heavy Lifting, the Rest Can Be Prunedcited by 856
- 2019BLiMP: The Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs for Englishcited by 564
- 2019ERNIE: Enhanced Representation through Knowledge Integrationcited by 302
- 2019Beto, Bentz, Becas: The Surprising Cross-Lingual Effectiveness of BERTcited by 301
- 2018Targeted Syntactic Evaluation of Language Modelscited by 242
- 2019Neural Language Models as Psycholinguistic Subjects: Representations of Syntactic Statecited by 138
- 2020Syntactic Structure from Deep Learningcited by 99
- 2018What do RNN Language Models Learn about Filler-Gap Dependencies?cited by 86
14 more
- 2023Testing the Predictions of Surprisal Theory in 11 Languagescited by 77
- 2024Language Models Learn Rare Phenomena from Less Rare Phenomena: The Case of the Missing AANNscited by 65
- 2019UER: An Open-Source Toolkit for Pre-training Modelscited by 62
- 2021Frequency Effects on Syntactic Rule Learning in Transformerscited by 59
- 2021CLiMP: A Benchmark for Chinese Language Model Evaluationcited by 46
- 2023Testing AI on language comprehension tasks reveals insensitivity to underlying meaningcited by 45
- 2021Refining Targeted Syntactic Evaluation of Language Modelscited by 41
- 2020CLUECorpus2020: A Large-scale Chinese Corpus for Pre-training Language Modelcited by 36
- 2021Language Models Use Monotonicity to Assess NPI Licensingcited by 31
- 2020Do Neural Language Models Show Preferences for Syntactic Formalisms?cited by 30
- 2022PERT: Pre-training BERT with Permuted Language Modelcited by 23
- 2022TencentPretrain: A Scalable and Flexible Toolkit for Pre-training Models of Different Modalitiescited by 19
- 2022SLING: Sino Linguistic Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 15
- 2023LLM Cognitive Judgements Differ From Humancited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.