Client Selection in Federated Learning with Data Heterogeneity and Network Latencies
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated learning (FL) is a distributed machine learning paradigm where multiple clients conduct local training based on their private data, then the updated models are sent to a central server for global aggregation. The practical convergence of FL is challenged by multiple factors, with the primary hurdle being the heterogeneity among clients. This heterogeneity manifests as data heterogeneity concerning local data distribution and latency heterogeneity during model transmission to the server. While prior research has introduced various efficient client selection methods to alleviate the negative impacts of either of these heterogeneities individually, efficient methods to handle real-world settings where both these heterogeneities exist simultaneously do not exist. In this paper, we propose two novel theoretically optimal client selection schemes that can handle both these heterogeneities. Our methods involve solving simple optimization problems every round obtained by minimizing the theoretical runtime to convergence. Empirical evaluations on 9 datasets with non-iid data distributions, 2 practical delay distributions, and non-convex neural network models demonstrate that our algorithms are at least competitive to and at most 20 times better than best existing baselines.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Apr 2025.
Builds on
25 of 44 references.
References · 25
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
- 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
- 2016Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiencycited by 1,461
- 2019On the Convergence of FedAvg on Non-IID Datacited by 1,220
- 2014How transferable are features in deep neural networks?cited by 1,216
- 2018LEAF: A Benchmark for Federated Settingscited by 780
- 2018On Lazy Training in Differentiable Programmingcited by 671
- 2018Local SGD Converges Fast and Communicates Littlecited by 595
- 2018Federated Learning for Mobile Keyboard Predictioncited by 565
- 2016Linear Convergence of Gradient and Proximal-Gradient Methods Under the Polyak-Lojasiewicz Conditioncited by 526
13 more
- 2019Federated Learning in Mobile Edge Networks: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 407
- 2018Client Selection for Federated Learning with Heterogeneous Resources in Mobile Edgecited by 347
- 2019Tighter Theory for Local SGD on Identical and Heterogeneous Datacited by 266
- 2020Loss landscapes and optimization in over-parameterized non-linear systems and neural networkscited by 231
- 2020Optimal Client Sampling for Federated Learningcited by 123
- 2021Clustered Sampling: Low-Variance and Improved Representativity for Clients Selection in Federated Learningcited by 93
- 2021Tackling System and Statistical Heterogeneity for Federated Learning with Adaptive Client Samplingcited by 66
- 2020Fast-Convergent Federated Learningcited by 61
- 2020Straggler-Resilient Federated Learning: Leveraging the Interplay Between Statistical Accuracy and System Heterogeneitycited by 56
- 2021Critical Parameters for Scalable Distributed Learning with Large Batches and Asynchronous Updatescited by 16
- 2018Nonconvex Variance Reduced Optimization with Arbitrary Samplingcited by 14
- 2023Async-HFL: Efficient and Robust Asynchronous Federated Learning in Hierarchical IoT Networkscited by 11
- 2014Provable Submodular Minimization using Wolfe's Algorithmcited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.