mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Token Pruning in Audio Transformers: Optimizing Performance and Decoding Patch Importance

arXiv 2504.01690 ↗First posted 2 Apr 2025cs.SD cs.AI eess.AScited by 12

On the map: Efficient LLM inference and serving → Token pruning and merging for ViTs

Abstract (arXiv)

Vision Transformers (ViTs) have achieved state-of-the-art performance across various computer vision tasks, but their high computational cost remains a challenge. Token pruning has been proposed to reduce this cost by selectively removing less important tokens. While effective in vision tasks by discarding non-object regions, applying this technique to audio tasks presents unique challenges, as distinguishing relevant from irrelevant regions in time-frequency representations is less straightforward. In this study, for the first time, we applied token pruning to ViT-based audio classification models using Mel-spectrograms and analyzed the trade-offs between model performance and computational cost: TopK token pruning can reduce MAC operations of AudioMAE and AST by 30-40%, with less than a 1% drop in accuracy. Our analysis reveals that while high-intensity or high-variation tokens contribute significantly to model accuracy, low-intensity or low variation tokens also remain important when token pruning is applied; pruning solely based on the intensity or variation of signals in a patch leads to a noticeable drop in accuracy. We support our claim by measuring high correlation between attention scores and these statistical features and by showing retained tokens consistently receive distinct attention compared to pruned ones. We also show that AudioMAE retains more low-intensity tokens than AST. This can be explained by AudioMAE's self-supervised reconstruction objective, which encourages attention to all patches, whereas AST's supervised training focuses on label-relevant tokens.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Token pruning and merging for ViTs, one of 12 directions in Efficient LLM inference and serving. Builds on 34 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Apr 2025.

Builds on

34 of 41 references.

Closest ancestors · 5

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Token Fusion: Bridging the Gap between Token Pruning and Token Merging2 Dec
  2. 2023Which Tokens to Use? Investigating Token Reduction in Vision Transformers9 Aug
  3. 2023Learned Thresholds Token Merging and Pruning for Vision Transformers20 Jul
  4. 2022Token Merging: Your ViT But Faster17 Oct
  5. 2021SPViT: Enabling Faster Vision Transformers via Soft Token Pruning27 Dec

Other references · 29

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  4. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  5. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
  6. 2019SpecAugment: A Simple Data Augmentation Method for Automatic Speech Recognitioncited by 1,355
  7. 2017Mixed Precision Trainingcited by 1,135
  8. 2021Multiscale Vision Transformerscited by 896
  9. 2018Speech Commands: A Dataset for Limited-Vocabulary Speech Recognitioncited by 741
  10. 2021AST: Audio Spectrogram Transformercited by 634
  11. 2022MaxViT: Multi-Axis Vision Transformercited by 476
  12. 2021AdaViT: Adaptive Tokens for Efficient Vision Transformercited by 360
17 more
  1. 2022Not All Patches are What You Need: Expediting Vision Transformers via Token Reorganizationscited by 359
  2. 2021Post-Training Quantization for Vision Transformercited by 274
  3. 2022Masked Autoencoders that Listencited by 271
  4. 2021Adaptive Token Sampling For Efficient Vision Transformerscited by 181
  5. 2022HTS-AT: A Hierarchical Token-Semantic Audio Transformer for Sound Classification and Detectioncited by 174
  6. 2021SSAST: Self-Supervised Audio Spectrogram Transformercited by 166
  7. 2024EAT: Self-Supervised Pre-Training with Efficient Audio Transformercited by 52
  8. 2021Multi-Exit Vision Transformer for Dynamic Inferencecited by 28
  9. 2023Self-supervised Audio Teacher-Student Transformer for Both Clip-level and Frame-level Taskscited by 25
  10. 2022Dynamic Spatial Sparsification for Efficient Vision Transformers and Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 23
  11. 2024Masked Modeling Duo: Towards a Universal Audio Pre-training Frameworkcited by 23
  12. 2024SpeechPrune: Context-aware Token Pruning for Speech Information Retrievalcited by 20
  13. 2022HuBERT-EE: Early Exiting HuBERT for Efficient Speech Recognitioncited by 13
  14. 2024DAISY: Data Adaptive Self-Supervised Early Exit for Speech Representation Modelscited by 4
  15. 2024FastAST: Accelerating Audio Spectrogram Transformer via Token Merging and Cross-Model Knowledge Distillationcited by 4
  16. 2023Training dynamic models using early exits for automatic speech recognition on resource-constrained devicescited by 3
  17. 2025Quantization for OpenAI's Whisper Models: A Comparative Analysiscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 9.

12 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Segmentwise Pruning in Audio-Language Models
  2. 2026ToaSt: Token Channel Selection and Structured Pruning for Efficient ViT
  3. 2025Similarity-Aware Token Pruning: Your VLM but Faster
  4. 2023PPT: Token Pruning and Pooling for Efficient Vision Transformers
  5. 2023Joint Token Pruning and Squeezing Towards More Aggressive Compression of Vision Transformers
  6. 2023Multi-Scale And Token Mergence: Make Your ViT More Efficient
  7. 2024Training Noise Token Pruning
  8. 2024Exploring Token Pruning in Vision State Space Models