mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Generative Retrieval and Alignment Model: A New Paradigm for E-commerce Retrieval

arXiv 2504.01403 ↗First posted 2 Apr 2025cs.IR cs.AI cs.CLcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Traditional sparse and dense retrieval methods struggle to leverage general world knowledge and often fail to capture the nuanced features of queries and products. With the advent of large language models (LLMs), industrial search systems have started to employ LLMs to generate identifiers for product retrieval. Commonly used identifiers include (1) static/semantic IDs and (2) product term sets. The first approach requires creating a product ID system from scratch, missing out on the world knowledge embedded within LLMs. While the second approach leverages this general knowledge, the significant difference in word distribution between queries and products means that product-based identifiers often do not align well with user search queries, leading to missed product recalls. Furthermore, when queries contain numerous attributes, these algorithms generate a large number of identifiers, making it difficult to assess their quality, which results in low overall recall efficiency. To address these challenges, this paper introduces a novel e-commerce retrieval paradigm: the Generative Retrieval and Alignment Model (GRAM). GRAM employs joint training on text information from both queries and products to generate shared text identifier codes, effectively bridging the gap between queries and products. This approach not only enhances the connection between queries and products but also improves inference efficiency. The model uses a co-alignment strategy to generate codes optimized for maximizing retrieval efficiency. Additionally, it introduces a query-product scoring mechanism to compare product values across different codes, further boosting retrieval efficiency. Extensive offline and online A/B testing demonstrates that GRAM significantly outperforms traditional models and the latest generative retrieval models, confirming its effectiveness and practicality.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Apr 2025.

Builds on

22 of 33 references.

References · 22

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  3. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  4. 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,779
  5. 2021SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddingscited by 2,168
  6. 2020ColBERT: Efficient and Effective Passage Search via Contextualized Late Interaction over BERTcited by 1,160
  7. 2020Approximate Nearest Neighbor Negative Contrastive Learning for Dense Text Retrievalcited by 846
  8. 2014Deep Learning in Neural Networks: An Overviewcited by 765
  9. 2021SoundStream: An End-to-End Neural Audio Codeccited by 756
  10. 2021Large Dual Encoders Are Generalizable Retrieverscited by 454
  11. 2022Transformer Memory as a Differentiable Search Indexcited by 242
  12. 2023Recommender Systems with Generative Retrievalcited by 191
10 more
  1. 2023Adapting Large Language Models by Integrating Collaborative Semantics for Recommendationcited by 171
  2. 2022Autoregressive Search Engines: Generating Substrings as Document Identifierscited by 112
  3. 2014Asymmetric LSH (ALSH) for Sublinear Time Maximum Inner Product Search (MIPS)cited by 109
  4. 2023Scalable and Effective Generative Information Retrievalcited by 38
  5. 2022Ultron: An Ultimate Retriever on Corpus with a Model-based Indexercited by 30
  6. 2023Semantic-Enhanced Differentiable Search Index Inspired by Learning Strategiescited by 25
  7. 2023GLEN: Generative Retrieval via Lexical Index Learningcited by 17
  8. 2023Auto Search Indexer for End-to-End Document Retrievalcited by 16
  9. 2023A Multi-Granularity Matching Attention Network for Query Intent Classification in E-commerce Retrievalcited by 8
  10. 2024A Semi-supervised Multi-channel Graph Convolutional Network for Query Classification in E-commercecited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 9.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Generative Retrieval with Preference Optimization for E-commerce Search
  2. 2025Automated Query-Product Relevance Labeling using Large Language Models for E-commerce Search
  3. 2026Synthetic Data Powers Product Retrieval for Long-tail Knowledge-Intensive Queries in E-commerce Search
  4. 2026Efficient Generative Retrieval for E-commerce Search with Semantic Cluster IDs and Expert-Guided RL
  5. 2026Semantic Retrieval for Product Search in E-Commerce
  6. 2024Learning variant product relationship and variation attributes from e-commerce website structures
  7. 2024Retrieve, Annotate, Evaluate, Repeat: Leveraging Multimodal LLMs for Large-Scale Product Retrieval Evaluation
  8. 2025LREF: A Novel LLM-based Relevance Framework for E-commerce