A Conformal Risk Control Framework for Granular Word Assessment and Uncertainty Calibration of CLIPScore Quality Estimates
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This study explores current limitations of learned image captioning evaluation metrics, specifically the lack of granular assessments for errors within captions, and the reliance on single-point quality estimates without considering uncertainty. To address the limitations, we propose a simple yet effective strategy for generating and calibrating distributions of CLIPScore values. Leveraging a model-agnostic conformal risk control framework, we calibrate CLIPScore values for task-specific control variables, tackling the aforementioned limitations. Experimental results demonstrate that using conformal risk control, over score distributions produced with simple methods such as input masking, can achieve competitive performance compared to more complex approaches. Our method effectively detects erroneous words, while providing formal guarantees aligned with desired risk levels. It also improves the correlation between uncertainty estimations and prediction errors, thus enhancing the overall reliability of caption evaluation metrics.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Apr 2025.
Builds on
26 of 41 references.
References · 26
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
- 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,152
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
- 2021CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioningcited by 2,424
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
- 2014CIDEr: Consensus-based Image Description Evaluationcited by 2,046
- 2021A Gentle Introduction to Conformal Prediction and Distribution-Free Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 792
- 2022PaLI: A Jointly-Scaled Multilingual Language-Image Modelcited by 766
- 2018Object Hallucination in Image Captioningcited by 669
- 2018nocaps: novel object captioning at scalecited by 444
14 more
- 2021Distribution-Free, Risk-Controlling Prediction Setscited by 288
- 2017FOIL it! Find One mismatch between Image and Language captioncited by 95
- 2018Uncertainty in Neural Networks: Approximately Bayesian Ensemblingcited by 94
- 2023Positive-Augmented Contrastive Learning for Image and Video Captioning Evaluationcited by 78
- 2018Bayesian Layers: A Module for Neural Network Uncertaintycited by 57
- 2024Polos: Multimodal Metric Learning from Human Feedback for Image Captioningcited by 46
- 2024ALOHa: A New Measure for Hallucination in Captioning Modelscited by 45
- 2015From Images to Sentences through Scene Description Graphs using Commonsense Reasoning and Knowledgecited by 35
- 2021Uncertainty-Aware Machine Translation Evaluationcited by 35
- 2022Mutual Information Divergence: A Unified Metric for Multimodal Generative Modelscited by 35
- 2020Know Your Limits: Uncertainty Estimation with ReLU Classifiers Fails at Reliable OOD Detectioncited by 26
- 2023InfoMetIC: An Informative Metric for Reference-free Image Caption Evaluationcited by 25
- 2024Extract Free Dense Misalignment from CLIPcited by 5
- 2025Evaluation of Multilingual Image Captioning: How far can we get with CLIP models?cited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.