mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Who Owns the Output? Bridging Law and Technology in LLMs Attribution

arXiv 2504.01032 ↗First posted 29 Mar 2025cs.CY cs.AIcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Since the introduction of ChatGPT in 2022, Large language models (LLMs) and Large Multimodal Models (LMM) have transformed content creation, enabling the generation of human-quality content, spanning every medium, text, images, videos, and audio. The chances offered by generative AI models are endless and are drastically reducing the time required to generate content and usually raising the quality of the generation. However, considering the complexity and the difficult traceability of the generated content, the use of these tools provides challenges in attributing AI-generated content. The difficult attribution resides for a variety of reasons, starting from the lack of a systematic fingerprinting of the generated content and ending with the enormous amount of data on which LLMs and LMM are trained, which makes it difficult to connect generated content to the training data. This scenario is raising concerns about intellectual property and ethical responsibilities. To address these concerns, in this paper, we bridge the technological, ethical, and legislative aspects, by proposing a review of the legislative and technological instruments today available and proposing a legal framework to ensure accountability. In the end, we propose three use cases of how these can be combined to guarantee that attribution is respected. However, even though the techniques available today can guarantee a greater attribution to a greater extent, strong limitations still apply, that can be solved uniquely by the development of new attribution techniques, to be applied to LLMs and LMMs.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 81 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Mar 2025.

Builds on

32 of 81 references.

References · 32

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  3. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  4. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  5. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
  6. 2023Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMscited by 946
  7. 2023The Geometry of Truth: Emergent Linear Structure in Large Language Model Representations of True/False Datasetscited by 673
  8. 2024Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 506
  9. 2017Methods for Interpreting and Understanding Deep Neural Networkscited by 342
  10. 2023Explainability for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 331
  11. 2018Targeted Syntactic Evaluation of Language Modelscited by 239
  12. 2016Understanding Neural Networks through Representation Erasurecited by 223
20 more
  1. 2018Representer Point Selection for Explaining Deep Neural Networkscited by 187
  2. 2023Tree-Ring Watermarks: Fingerprints for Diffusion Images that are Invisible and Robustcited by 179
  3. 2022On the Origin of Hallucinations in Conversational Models: Is it the Datasets or the Models?cited by 137
  4. 2022Text and Patterns: For Effective Chain of Thought, It Takes Two to Tangocited by 128
  5. 2023Foundation Models and Fair Usecited by 112
  6. 2023A Survey on Fairness in Large Language Modelscited by 91
  7. 2023A Survey of GPT-3 Family Large Language Models Including ChatGPT and GPT-4cited by 81
  8. 2023Watermarks in the Sand: Impossibility of Strong Watermarking for Generative Modelscited by 77
  9. 2024Can ChatGPT Detect DeepFakes? A Study of Using Multimodal Large Language Models for Media Forensicscited by 68
  10. 2024Instructional Fingerprinting of Large Language Modelscited by 64
  11. 2024A Comprehensive Review of Multimodal Large Language Models: Performance and Challenges Across Different Taskscited by 57
  12. 2024LLMmap: Fingerprinting For Large Language Modelscited by 56
  13. 2023Sequential Integrated Gradients: a simple but effective method for explaining language modelscited by 52
  14. 2024Recent Advances in Generative AI and Large Language Models: Current Status, Challenges, and Perspectivescited by 30
  15. 2024Generative AI in EU Law: Liability, Privacy, Intellectual Property, and Cybersecuritycited by 21
  16. 2024Watermark-based Attribution of AI-Generated Contentcited by 8
  17. 2023Blockchain-Empowered Lifecycle Management for AI-Generated Content (AIGC) Products in Edge Networkscited by 6
  18. 2022A Comprehensive Review on Digital Image Watermarkingcited by 2
  19. 2018A Blockchain Based Liability Attribution Framework for Autonomous Vehiclescited by 1
  20. 2024Copyright related risks in the creation and use of ML/AI systemscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023Regulating ChatGPT and other Large Generative AI Models
  2. 2024It Cannot Be Right If It Was Written by AI: On Lawyers' Preferences of Documents Perceived as Authored by an LLM vs a Human
  3. 2025Bridging the Copyright Gap: Do Large Vision-Language Models Recognize and Respect Copyrighted Content?
  4. 2025Could AI Trace and Explain the Origins of AI-Generated Images and Text?
  5. 2023Source Attribution for Large Language Model-Generated Data
  6. 2024Deconstructing The Ethics of Large Language Models from Long-standing Issues to New-emerging Dilemmas: A Survey
  7. 2024LLMs Meet Multimodal Generation and Editing: A Survey
  8. 2025Nine Ways to Break Copyright Law and Why Our LLM Won't: A Fair Use Aligned Generation Framework