Impact of Data Duplication on Deep Neural Network-Based Image Classifiers: Robust vs. Standard Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The accuracy and robustness of machine learning models against adversarial attacks are significantly influenced by factors such as training data quality, model architecture, the training process, and the deployment environment. In recent years, duplicated data in training sets, especially in language models, has attracted considerable attention. It has been shown that deduplication enhances both training performance and model accuracy in language models. While the importance of data quality in training image classifier Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) is widely recognized, the impact of duplicated images in the training set on model generalization and performance has received little attention. In this paper, we address this gap and provide a comprehensive study on the effect of duplicates in image classification. Our analysis indicates that the presence of duplicated images in the training set not only negatively affects the efficiency of model training but also may result in lower accuracy of the image classifier. This negative impact of duplication on accuracy is particularly evident when duplicated data is non-uniform across classes or when duplication, whether uniform or non-uniform, occurs in the training set of an adversarially trained model. Even when duplicated samples are selected in a uniform way, increasing the amount of duplication does not lead to a significant improvement in accuracy.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Apr 2025.
Builds on
12 of 25 references.
References · 12
- 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
- 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
- 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 950
- 2022Quantifying Memorization Across Neural Language Modelscited by 755
- 2021Deduplicating Training Data Makes Language Models Bettercited by 705
- 2020What Neural Networks Memorize and Why: Discovering the Long Tail via Influence Estimationcited by 492
- 2019Adversarial Training and Robustness for Multiple Perturbationscited by 182
- 2019Do We Train on Test Data? Purging CIFAR of Near-Duplicatescited by 61
- 2023It Is All About Data: A Survey on the Effects of Data on Adversarial Robustnesscited by 9
- 2021CE-Dedup: Cost-Effective Convolutional Neural Nets Training based on Image Deduplicationcited by 4
- 2020Vulnerability Under Adversarial Machine Learning: Bias or Variance?cited by 2
- 2024Privacy-Preserving Data Deduplication for Enhancing Federated Learning of Language Models (Extended Version)cited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
4 papers.
- 2025The Landscape of Memorization in LLMs: Mechanisms, Measurement, and Mitigationcited by 9
- 2026ContextShift: A Controlled Benchmark for Context Dependence in Object Detectioncited by 0
- 2026Limitations of Synthetic Data Generation in Specialized Data-Scarce Domainscited by 0
- 2026I Have a Stream: Making Self-Supervised Learning Work on Continuous Videocited by 0
- 2026I Have a Stream: Making Self-Supervised Learning Work on Continuous Video30 Sep 2026
- 2026Limitations of Synthetic Data Generation in Specialized Data-Scarce Domains13 Aug 2026
- 2026ContextShift: A Controlled Benchmark for Context Dependence in Object Detection8 Jun 2026
- 2025The Landscape of Memorization in LLMs: Mechanisms, Measurement, and Mitigation8 Jul 2025