Making Large Language Models Better Reasoners with Orchestrated Streaming Experiences
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) can perform complex reasoning by generating intermediate thoughts under zero-shot or few-shot settings. However, zero-shot prompting always encounters low performance, and the superior performance of few-shot prompting hinges on the manual-crafted demonstrations. In this paper, we present RoSE (Reasoning with Orchestrated Streaming Experiences), a general framework for solving reasoning tasks that can self-improve without complex external efforts. To enable RoSE, we describe an architecture that extends an LLM to store all answered questions and their thoughts in a streaming experience pool then orchestrates helpful questions from the pool to assist in answering new questions. To set up a question-aware orchestration mechanism, RoSE first calculates the similarity of each question in the pool with a new test question. Since the solution to each answered question is not always correct, RoSE will sort the questions according to their similarity with the new question, and then uniformly divide them into multiple buckets. It finally extracts one question from each bucket to make these extracted questions more diverse. To make these extracted questions help RoSE answer new questions as much as possible, we introduce two other attributes of uncertainty and complexity for each question. RoSE will preferentially select the questions with low uncertainty and high complexity from each bucket. We evaluate the versatility of RoSE in various reasoning tasks, LLMs, and CoT methods.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 15 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Apr 2025.
Builds on
15 of 38 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 14
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,326
- 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,276
- 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,211
- 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
- 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,998
- 2022LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applicationscited by 1,220
- 2022Program of Thoughts Prompting: Disentangling Computation from Reasoning for Numerical Reasoning Taskscited by 1,076
- 2023ExpeL: LLM Agents Are Experiential Learnerscited by 876
- 2024In-context Learning with Retrieved Demonstrations for Language Models: A Surveycited by 70
2 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025StreamingThinker: Large Language Models Can Think While Reading
- 2024Teaching Smaller Language Models To Generalise To Unseen Compositional Questions (Full Thesis)
- 2025T2: An Adaptive Test-Time Scaling Strategy for Contextual Question Answering
- 2023Large Language Model Cascades with Mixture of Thoughts Representations for Cost-efficient Reasoning
- 2025Plan and Budget: Effective and Efficient Test-Time Scaling on Reasoning Large Language Models
- 2022Faithful Reasoning Using Large Language Models
- 2025Think Smart, Not Hard: Difficulty Adaptive Reasoning for Large Audio Language Models
- 2026ReHoPER: Receding-Horizon Planning for Enhanced Reasoning