VerifiAgent: a Unified Verification Agent in Language Model Reasoning
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation
also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models demonstrate remarkable reasoning capabilities but often produce unreliable or incorrect responses. Existing verification methods are typically model-specific or domain-restricted, requiring significant computational resources and lacking scalability across diverse reasoning tasks. To address these limitations, we propose VerifiAgent, a unified verification agent that integrates two levels of verification: meta-verification, which assesses completeness and consistency in model responses, and tool-based adaptive verification, where VerifiAgent autonomously selects appropriate verification tools based on the reasoning type, including mathematical, logical, or commonsense reasoning. This adaptive approach ensures both efficiency and robustness across different verification scenarios. Experimental results show that VerifiAgent outperforms baseline verification methods (e.g., deductive verifier, backward verifier) among all reasoning tasks. Additionally, it can further enhance reasoning accuracy by leveraging feedback from verification results. VerifiAgent can also be effectively applied to inference scaling, achieving better results with fewer generated samples and costs compared to existing process reward models in the mathematical reasoning domain. Code is available at https://github.com/Jiuzhouh/VerifiAgent
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 17 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Apr 2025.
Builds on
17 of 40 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 16
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713
- 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameterscited by 1,928
- 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,384
- 2024Qwen2.5-Math Technical Report: Toward Mathematical Expert Model via Self-Improvementcited by 1,057
- 2024Large Language Monkeys: Scaling Inference Compute with Repeated Samplingcited by 946
- 2024From Generation to Judgment: Opportunities and Challenges of LLM-as-a-judgecited by 480
- 2025The Lessons of Developing Process Reward Models in Mathematical Reasoningcited by 402
- 2024On the Self-Verification Limitations of Large Language Models on Reasoning and Planning Taskscited by 137
4 more
- 2025Scaling Test-Time Compute Without Verification or RL is Suboptimalcited by 82
- 2024The Limits of Inference Scaling Through Resamplingcited by 51
- 2024Improving LLM Reasoning through Scaling Inference Computation with Collaborative Verificationcited by 40
- 2024Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Key Condition Verificationcited by 39
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 9.
10 papers.
- 2026Self-Improvements in Modern Agentic Systems: A Surveycited by 17
- 2026Agent-as-a-Judgecited by 15
- 2026The Evolution of Tool Use in LLM Agents: From Single-Tool Call to Multi-Tool Orchestrationcited by 11
- 2026AJ-Bench: Benchmarking Agent-as-a-Judge for Environment-Aware Evaluationcited by 10
- 2026DynaDebate: Breaking Homogeneity in Multi-Agent Debate with Dynamic Path Generationcited by 5
- 2025All Roads Lead to Rome: Graph-Based Confidence Estimation for Large Language Model Reasoningcited by 3
- 2026Residual Drift Dominates Contradiction in Multi-Turn Constraint Reasoningcited by 0
- 2026Omni-Decision: Evidence-Ledger Planning for Omni-Modal Agentscited by 0
- 2026Grading the Graders: Verification Autonomy Levels (L0-L5) for LLM Reasoningcited by 0
- 2026Clarify the User or Verify the World? Uncertainty Routing for Proactive Agentscited by 0
- 2026Clarify the User or Verify the World? Uncertainty Routing for Proactive Agents26 Sep 2026
- 2026Grading the Graders: Verification Autonomy Levels (L0-L5) for LLM Reasoning19 Aug 2026
- 2026Self-Improvements in Modern Agentic Systems: A Survey14 Jul 2026
- 2026Omni-Decision: Evidence-Ledger Planning for Omni-Modal Agents13 Jul 2026
- 2026Residual Drift Dominates Contradiction in Multi-Turn Constraint Reasoning28 Apr 2026
- 2026AJ-Bench: Benchmarking Agent-as-a-Judge for Environment-Aware Evaluation20 Apr 2026
- 2026The Evolution of Tool Use in LLM Agents: From Single-Tool Call to Multi-Tool Orchestration24 Mar 2026
- 2026DynaDebate: Breaking Homogeneity in Multi-Agent Debate with Dynamic Path Generation9 Jan 2026
- 2026Agent-as-a-Judge8 Jan 2026
- 2025All Roads Lead to Rome: Graph-Based Confidence Estimation for Large Language Model Reasoning16 Sep 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Variation in Verification: Understanding Verification Dynamics in Large Language Models
- 2026Verify to Amplify: Improving Reasoning via Learned Chain-of-Thought Verification
- 2026VERGE: Formal Refinement and Guidance Engine for Verifiable LLM Reasoning
- 2024General Purpose Verification for Chain of Thought Prompting
- 2025VerifyBench: A Systematic Benchmark for Evaluating Reasoning Verifiers Across Domains
- 2025Graph of Verification: Structured Verification of LLM Reasoning with Directed Acyclic Graphs
- 2024textttLM^texttt2: A Simple Society of Language Models Solves Complex Reasoning
- 2026TRUE: A Trustworthy Unified Explanation Framework for Large Language Model Reasoning