mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

It's a (Blind) Match! Towards Vision-Language Correspondence without Parallel Data

arXiv 2503.24129 ↗First posted 31 Mar 2025cs.CV cs.LGcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The platonic representation hypothesis suggests that vision and language embeddings become more homogeneous as model and dataset sizes increase. In particular, pairwise distances within each modality become more similar. This suggests that as foundation models mature, it may become possible to match vision and language embeddings in a fully unsupervised fashion, i.e. without parallel data. We present the first feasibility study, and investigate conformity of existing vision and language foundation models in the context of unsupervised, or "blind", matching. First, we formulate unsupervised matching as a quadratic assignment problem and introduce a novel heuristic that outperforms previous solvers. We also develop a technique to find optimal matching problems, for which a non-trivial match is very likely. Second, we conduct an extensive study deploying a range of vision and language models on four datasets. Our analysis reveals that for many problem instances, vision and language representations can be indeed matched without supervision. This finding opens up the exciting possibility of embedding semantic knowledge into other modalities virtually annotation-free. As a proof of concept, we showcase an unsupervised classifier, which achieves non-trivial classification accuracy without any image-text annotation.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Mar 2025.

Builds on

34 of 58 references.

References · 34

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  4. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  5. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  6. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
  7. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  8. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
  9. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
  10. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
  11. 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latentscited by 6,585
  12. 2022Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language Understandingcited by 6,355
22 more
  1. 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,326
  2. 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,586
  3. 2021Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generationcited by 4,288
  4. 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,579
  5. 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,576
  6. 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,755
  7. 2021Align before Fuse: Vision and Language Representation Learning with Momentum Distillationcited by 1,619
  8. 2015Microsoft COCO Captions: Data Collection and Evaluation Servercited by 1,462
  9. 2021WIT: Wikipedia-based Image Text Dataset for Multimodal Multilingual Machine Learningcited by 287
  10. 2022Unsupervised Semantic Segmentation by Distilling Feature Correspondencescited by 241
  11. 2022Relative representations enable zero-shot latent space communicationcited by 191
  12. 2019Gromov-Wasserstein Learning for Graph Matching and Node Embeddingcited by 126
  13. 2018Gromov-Wasserstein Alignment of Word Embedding Spacescited by 122
  14. 2022MagicPony: Learning Articulated 3D Animals in the Wildcited by 112
  15. 2019Scalable Gromov-Wasserstein Learning for Graph Partitioning and Matchingcited by 103
  16. 2020Graph Optimal Transport for Cross-Domain Alignmentcited by 103
  17. 2023Latent Space Translation via Semantic Alignmentcited by 52
  18. 2022ASIF: Coupled Data Turns Unimodal Models to Multimodal Without Trainingcited by 47
  19. 2024Do Vision and Language Encoders Represent the World Similarly?cited by 44
  20. 2021Fusion Moves for Graph Matchingcited by 16
  21. 2022A Comparative Study of Graph Matching Algorithms in Computer Visioncited by 14
  22. 2023GeRA: Label-Efficient Geometrically Regularized Alignmentcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 7; 2026: 7.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area: