Green MLOps to Green GenOps: An Empirical Study of Energy Consumption in Discriminative and Generative AI Operations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This study presents an empirical investigation into the energy consumption of Discriminative and Generative AI models within real-world MLOps pipelines. For Discriminative models, we examine various architectures and hyperparameters during training and inference and identify energy-efficient practices. For Generative AI, Large Language Models (LLMs) are assessed, focusing primarily on energy consumption across different model sizes and varying service requests. Our study employs software-based power measurements, ensuring ease of replication across diverse configurations, models, and datasets. We analyse multiple models and hardware setups to uncover correlations among various metrics, identifying key contributors to energy consumption. The results indicate that for Discriminative models, optimising architectures, hyperparameters, and hardware can significantly reduce energy consumption without sacrificing performance. For LLMs, energy efficiency depends on balancing model size, reasoning complexity, and request-handling capacity, as larger models do not necessarily consume more energy when utilisation remains low. This analysis provides practical guidelines for designing green and sustainable ML operations, emphasising energy consumption and carbon footprint reductions while maintaining performance. This paper can serve as a benchmark for accurately estimating total energy use across different types of AI models.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Mar 2025.
Builds on
22 of 53 references.
References · 22
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
- 2019Green AIcited by 620
- 2021Sustainable AI: Environmental Implications, Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 242
- 2022The Carbon Footprint of Machine Learning Training Will Plateau, Then Shrinkcited by 183
- 2023From Words to Watts: Benchmarking the Energy Costs of Large Language Model Inferencecited by 168
- 2016Designing Energy-Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks using Energy-Aware Pruningcited by 133
- 2024The rising costs of training frontier AI modelscited by 91
- 2023A Systematic Review of Green AIcited by 77
- 2019Combining Generative and Discriminative Models for Hybrid Inferencecited by 34
- 2023A Survey on ChatGPT: AI-Generated Contents, Challenges, and Solutionscited by 34
10 more
- 2024Generative AI Agents with Large Language Model for Satellite Networks via a Mixture of Experts Transmissioncited by 34
- 2024The Price of Prompting: Profiling Energy Use in Large Language Models Inferencecited by 22
- 2024A Survey of Sustainability in Large Language Models: Applications, Economics, and Challengescited by 18
- 2024Computing Within Limits: An Empirical Study of Energy Consumption in ML Training and Inferencecited by 4
- 2024Large Generative AI Models meet Open Networks for 6G: Integration, Platform, and Monetizationcited by 4
- 2024An exploration of the effect of quantisation on energy consumption and inference time of StarCoder2cited by 4
- 2022Energy-Rate-Quality Tradeoffs of State-of-the-Art Video Codecscited by 2
- 2023FROST: Towards Energy-efficient AI-on-5G Platforms -- A GPU Power Capping Evaluationcited by 2
- 2024Adapting MLOps for Diverse In-Network Intelligence in 6G Era: Challenges and Solutionscited by 2
- 2024AI-Native Multi-Access Future Networks -- The REASON Architecturecited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.