Conformal uncertainty quantification to evaluate predictive fairness of foundation AI model for skin lesion classes across patient demographics
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep learning based diagnostic AI systems based on medical images are starting to provide similar performance as human experts. However these data hungry complex systems are inherently black boxes and therefore slow to be adopted for high risk applications like healthcare. This problem of lack of transparency is exacerbated in the case of recent large foundation models, which are trained in a self supervised manner on millions of data points to provide robust generalisation across a range of downstream tasks, but the embeddings generated from them happen through a process that is not interpretable, and hence not easily trustable for clinical applications. To address this timely issue, we deploy conformal analysis to quantify the predictive uncertainty of a vision transformer (ViT) based foundation model across patient demographics with respect to sex, age and ethnicity for the tasks of skin lesion classification using several public benchmark datasets. The significant advantage of this method is that conformal analysis is method independent and it not only provides a coverage guarantee at population level but also provides an uncertainty score for each individual. We used a model-agnostic dynamic F1-score-based sampling during model training, which helped to stabilize the class imbalance and we investigate the effects on uncertainty quantification (UQ) with or without this bias mitigation step. Thus we show how this can be used as a fairness metric to evaluate the robustness of the feature embeddings of the foundation model (Google DermFoundation) and thus advance the trustworthiness and fairness of clinical AI.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Mar 2025.
Builds on
15 of 64 references.
References · 15
- 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158
- 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,310
- 2022DINO: DETR with Improved DeNoising Anchor Boxes for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 1,306
- 2019Big Transfer (BiT): General Visual Representation Learningcited by 766
- 2024Theoretical Foundations of Conformal Predictioncited by 96
- 2021Fair Conformal Predictors for Applications in Medical Imagingcited by 74
- 2023Text-guided Foundation Model Adaptation for Pathological Image Classificationcited by 47
- 2024MedImageInsight: An Open-Source Embedding Model for General Domain Medical Imagingcited by 45
- 2023Are Natural Domain Foundation Models Useful for Medical Image Classification?cited by 44
- 2024Robust Yet Efficient Conformal Prediction Setscited by 16
- 2020CHS-Net: A Deep learning approach for hierarchical segmentation of COVID-19 infected CT imagescited by 7
- 2024Multimodal Deep Learning for Low-Resource Settings: A Vector Embedding Alignment Approach for Healthcare Applicationscited by 4
3 more
- 2025Generating crossmodal gene expression from cancer histopathology improves multimodal AI predictionscited by 4
- 2024Embeddings are all you need! Achieving High Performance Medical Image Classification through Training-Free Embedding Analysiscited by 2
- 2021Meta-learning for skin cancer detection using Deep Learning Techniquescited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.