mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

What Makes an Evaluation Useful? Common Pitfalls and Best Practices

arXiv 2503.23424 ↗First posted 30 Mar 2025cs.LG cs.AI cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Following the rapid increase in Artificial Intelligence (AI) capabilities in recent years, the AI community has voiced concerns regarding possible safety risks. To support decision-making on the safe use and development of AI systems, there is a growing need for high-quality evaluations of dangerous model capabilities. While several attempts to provide such evaluations have been made, a clear definition of what constitutes a "good evaluation" has yet to be agreed upon. In this practitioners' perspective paper, we present a set of best practices for safety evaluations, drawing on prior work in model evaluation and illustrated through cybersecurity examples. We first discuss the steps of the initial thought process, which connects threat modeling to evaluation design. Then, we provide the characteristics and parameters that make an evaluation useful. Finally, we address additional considerations as we move from building specific evaluations to building a full and comprehensive evaluation suite.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Mar 2025.

Builds on

21 of 38 references.

References · 21

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2019Solving Rubik's Cube with a Robot Handcited by 734
  3. 2024The WMDP Benchmark: Measuring and Reducing Malicious Use With Unlearningcited by 509
  4. 2023NLP Evaluation in trouble: On the Need to Measure LLM Data Contamination for each Benchmarkcited by 348
  5. 2024Large Language Models for Mathematical Reasoning: Progresses and Challengescited by 284
  6. 2023An Overview of Catastrophic AI Riskscited by 222
  7. 2023Any-to-Any Generation via Composable Diffusioncited by 204
  8. 2023"Kelly is a Warm Person, Joseph is a Role Model": Gender Biases in LLM-Generated Reference Letterscited by 199
  9. 2024VASA-1: Lifelike Audio-Driven Talking Faces Generated in Real Timecited by 187
  10. 2023Model evaluation for extreme riskscited by 177
  11. 2024Evaluating Frontier Models for Dangerous Capabilitiescited by 128
  12. 2023Frontier AI Regulation: Managing Emerging Risks to Public Safetycited by 98
9 more
  1. 2024On Protecting the Data Privacy of Large Language Models (LLMs): A Surveycited by 96
  2. 2024Red-Teaming for Generative AI: Silver Bullet or Security Theater?cited by 83
  3. 2024CYBERSECEVAL 3: Advancing the Evaluation of Cybersecurity Risks and Capabilities in Large Language Modelscited by 58
  4. 2024An Empirical Evaluation of LLMs for Solving Offensive Security Challengescited by 35
  5. 2024Towards interactive evaluations for interaction harms in human-AI systemscited by 29
  6. 2023LLMEval: A Preliminary Study on How to Evaluate Large Language Modelscited by 23
  7. 2024Evaluating AI Evaluation: Perils and Prospectscited by 11
  8. 2024Risk thresholds for frontier AIcited by 9
  9. 2023Toward best research practices in AI Psychologycited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.