mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Joint Source-Environment Adaptation of Data-Driven Underwater Acoustic Source Ranging Based on Model Uncertainty

arXiv 2503.23258 ↗First posted 30 Mar 2025cs.SD cs.LG eess.AScited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Adapting pre-trained deep learning models to new and unknown environments remains a major challenge in underwater acoustic localization. We show that although the performance of pre-trained models suffers from mismatch between the training and test data, they generally exhibit a higher uncertainty in environments where there is more mismatch. Additionally, in the presence of environmental mismatch, spurious peaks can appear in the output of classification-based localization approaches, which inspires us to define and use a method to quantify the "implied uncertainty" based on the number of model output peaks. Leveraging this notion of implied uncertainty, we partition the test samples into sets with more certain and less certain samples, and implement a method to adapt the model to new environments by using the certain samples to improve the labeling for uncertain samples, which helps to adapt the model. Thus, using this efficient method for model uncertainty quantification, we showcase an innovative approach to adapt a pre-trained model to unseen underwater environments at test time. This eliminates the need for labeled data from the target environment or the original training data. This adaptation is enhanced by integrating an independent estimate based on the received signal energy. We validate the approach extensively using real experimental data, as well as synthetic data consisting of model-generated signals with real ocean noise. The results demonstrate significant improvements in model prediction accuracy, underscoring the potential of the method to enhance underwater acoustic localization in diverse, noisy, and unknown environments.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Mar 2025.

Builds on

18 of 61 references.

References · 18

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,093
  2. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,430
  3. 2014Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Backpropagationcited by 1,909
  4. 2014How transferable are features in deep neural networks?cited by 1,219
  5. 2020Do We Really Need to Access the Source Data? Source Hypothesis Transfer for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 846
  6. 2020A Review of Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Learning: Techniques, Applications and Challengescited by 817
  7. 2021A Gentle Introduction to Conformal Prediction and Distribution-Free Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 786
  8. 2021A Survey of Uncertainty in Deep Neural Networkscited by 676
  9. 2022Contrastive Test-Time Adaptationcited by 259
  10. 2020Universal Source-Free Domain Adaptationcited by 219
  11. 2022Improving Out-of-Distribution Robustness via Selective Augmentationcited by 202
  12. 2018Understanding Measures of Uncertainty for Adversarial Example Detectioncited by 177
6 more
  1. 2021Deep Subdomain Adaptation Network for Image Classificationcited by 119
  2. 2022Source-Free Domain Adaptation via Distribution Estimationcited by 97
  3. 2017Source localization in an ocean waveguide using supervised machine learningcited by 5
  4. 2019Deep-learning source localization using multi-frequency magnitude-only datacited by 3
  5. 2021A Semi-Blind Method for Localization of Underwater Acoustic Sourcescited by 2
  6. 2022Direct Localization in Underwater Acoustics via Convolutional Neural Networks: A Data-Driven Approachcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.