mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

MoRE-LLM: Mixture of Rule Experts Guided by a Large Language Model

arXiv 2503.22731 ↗First posted 26 Mar 2025cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

To ensure the trustworthiness and interpretability of AI systems, it is essential to align machine learning models with human domain knowledge. This can be a challenging and time-consuming endeavor that requires close communication between data scientists and domain experts. Recent leaps in the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) can help alleviate this burden. In this paper, we propose a Mixture of Rule Experts guided by a Large Language Model (MoRE-LLM) which combines a data-driven black-box model with knowledge extracted from an LLM to enable domain knowledge-aligned and transparent predictions. While the introduced Mixture of Rule Experts (MoRE) steers the discovery of local rule-based surrogates during training and their utilization for the classification task, the LLM is responsible for enhancing the domain knowledge alignment of the rules by correcting and contextualizing them. Importantly, our method does not rely on access to the LLM during test time and ensures interpretability while not being prone to LLM-based confabulations. We evaluate our method on several tabular data sets and compare its performance with interpretable and non-interpretable baselines. Besides performance, we evaluate our grey-box method with respect to the utilization of interpretable rules. In addition to our quantitative evaluation, we shed light on how the LLM can provide additional context to strengthen the comprehensibility and trustworthiness of the model's reasoning process.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Mar 2025.

Builds on

11 of 20 references.

References · 11

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2023Siren's Song in the AI Ocean: A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Modelscited by 698
  3. 2014OpenML: networked science in machine learningcited by 526
  4. 2018Consistent Individualized Feature Attribution for Tree Ensemblescited by 285
  5. 2021GLocalX -- From Local to Global Explanations of Black Box AI Modelscited by 48
  6. 2021Preferential Mixture-of-Experts: Interpretable Models that Rely on Human Expertise as much as Possiblecited by 19
  7. 2022Learning Interpretable Decision Rule Sets: A Submodular Optimization Approachcited by 13
  8. 2013Interpreting random forest classification models using a feature contribution methodcited by 6
  9. 2020MAIRE -- A Model-Agnostic Interpretable Rule Extraction Procedure for Explaining Classifierscited by 6
  10. 2022Truly Unordered Probabilistic Rule Sets for Multi-class Classificationcited by 6
  11. 2023The Thousand Faces of Explainable AI Along the Machine Learning Life Cycle: Industrial Reality and Current State of Researchcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Do Domain-specific Experts exist in MoE-based LLMs?
  2. 2024Unconstrained Model Merging for Enhanced LLM Reasoning
  3. 2025Learned-Rule-Augmented Large Language Model Evaluators
  4. 2024A Teacher Is Worth A Million Instructions
  5. 2025Do LLMs Dream of Discrete Algorithms?
  6. 2024Large Language Models are Interpretable Learners
  7. 2025Adapting Language-Specific LLMs to a Reasoning Model in One Day via Model Merging -- An Open Recipe
  8. 2025RIMRULE: Improving Tool-Using Language Agents via MDL-Guided Rule Learning