Lipschitz Constant Meets Condition Number: Learning Robust and Compact Deep Neural Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent research has revealed that high compression of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs), e.g., massive pruning of the weight matrix of a DNN, leads to a severe drop in accuracy and susceptibility to adversarial attacks. Integration of network pruning into an adversarial training framework has been proposed to promote adversarial robustness. It has been observed that a highly pruned weight matrix tends to be ill-conditioned, i.e., increasing the condition number of the weight matrix. This phenomenon aggravates the vulnerability of a DNN to input noise. Although a highly pruned weight matrix is considered to be able to lower the upper bound of the local Lipschitz constant to tolerate large distortion, the ill-conditionedness of such a weight matrix results in a non-robust DNN model. To overcome this challenge, this work develops novel joint constraints to adjust the weight distribution of networks, namely, the Transformed Sparse Constraint joint with Condition Number Constraint (TSCNC), which copes with smoothing distribution and differentiable constraint functions to reduce condition number and thus avoid the ill-conditionedness of weight matrices. Furthermore, our theoretical analyses unveil the relevance between the condition number and the local Lipschitz constant of the weight matrix, namely, the sharply increasing condition number becomes the dominant factor that restricts the robustness of over-sparsified models. Extensive experiments are conducted on several public datasets, and the results show that the proposed constraints significantly improve the robustness of a DNN with high pruning rates.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Mar 2025.
Builds on
30 of 39 references.
References · 30
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
- 2015Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Codingcited by 2,329
- 2015Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networkscited by 2,031
- 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,517
- 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,451
- 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 880
- 2017Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Timecited by 689
- 2019Square Attack: a query-efficient black-box adversarial attack via random searchcited by 685
- 2017Learning Sparse Neural Networks through L0 Regularizationcited by 583
- 2016Dynamic Network Surgery for Efficient DNNscited by 233
18 more
- 2013Predicting Parameters in Deep Learningcited by 224
- 2023A Survey on Deep Neural Network Pruning-Taxonomy, Comparison, Analysis, and Recommendationscited by 202
- 2017Formal Guarantees on the Robustness of a Classifier against Adversarial Manipulationcited by 185
- 2018Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networks: An Extreme Value Theory Approachcited by 182
- 2021A Universal Law of Robustness via Isoperimetrycited by 151
- 2015Structured Pruning of Deep Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 149
- 2023Structured Pruning for Deep Convolutional Neural Networks: A surveycited by 122
- 2017Soft Weight-Sharing for Neural Network Compressioncited by 99
- 2019Adversarial Robustness vs Model Compression, or Both?cited by 98
- 2018Sparse DNNs with Improved Adversarial Robustnesscited by 72
- 2019Model Compression with Adversarial Robustness: A Unified Optimization Frameworkcited by 71
- 2018Training for Faster Adversarial Robustness Verification via Inducing ReLU Stabilitycited by 67
- 2020A law of robustness for two-layers neural networkscited by 55
- 2022Masking Adversarial Damage: Finding Adversarial Saliency for Robust and Sparse Networkcited by 21
- 2019The Search for Sparse, Robust Neural Networkscited by 11
- 2022Linearity Grafting: Relaxed Neuron Pruning Helps Certifiable Robustnesscited by 10
- 2020Improve Generalization and Robustness of Neural Networks via Weight Scale Shifting Invariant Regularizationscited by 9
- 2018Neural Networks in Adversarial Setting and Ill-Conditioned Weight Spacecited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.