mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Natural Language Processing for Electronic Health Records in Scandinavian Languages: Norwegian, Swedish, and Danish

arXiv 2503.18539 ↗First posted 24 Mar 2025cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Background: Clinical natural language processing (NLP) refers to the use of computational methods for extracting, processing, and analyzing unstructured clinical text data, and holds a huge potential to transform healthcare in various clinical tasks. Objective: The study aims to perform a systematic review to comprehensively assess and analyze the state-of-the-art NLP methods for the mainland Scandinavian clinical text. Method: A literature search was conducted in various online databases including PubMed, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, ACM digital library, and IEEE Xplore between December 2022 and February 2024. Further, relevant references to the included articles were also used to solidify our search. The final pool includes articles that conducted clinical NLP in the mainland Scandinavian languages and were published in English between 2010 and 2024. Results: Out of the 113 articles, 18% (n=21) focus on Norwegian clinical text, 64% (n=72) on Swedish, 10% (n=11) on Danish, and 8% (n=9) focus on more than one language. Generally, the review identified positive developments across the region despite some observable gaps and disparities between the languages. There are substantial disparities in the level of adoption of transformer-based models. In essential tasks such as de-identification, there is significantly less research activity focusing on Norwegian and Danish compared to Swedish text. Further, the review identified a low level of sharing resources such as data, experimentation code, pre-trained models, and rate of adaptation and transfer learning in the region. Conclusion: The review presented a comprehensive assessment of the state-of-the-art Clinical NLP for electronic health records (EHR) text in mainland Scandinavian languages and, highlighted the potential barriers and challenges that hinder the rapid advancement of the field in the region.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 142 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Mar 2025.

Builds on

15 of 142 references.

References · 15

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  4. 2019ClinicalBERT: Modeling Clinical Notes and Predicting Hospital Readmissioncited by 487
  5. 2019Transfer Learning in Biomedical Natural Language Processing: An Evaluation of BERT and ELMo on Ten Benchmarking Datasetscited by 298
  6. 2017Recent Trends in Deep Learning Based Natural Language Processingcited by 262
  7. 2022Large Language Models are Few-Shot Clinical Information Extractorscited by 206
  8. 2020A Survey on Recent Approaches for Natural Language Processing in Low-Resource Scenarioscited by 170
  9. 2023DeID-GPT: Zero-shot Medical Text De-Identification by GPT-4cited by 128
  10. 2023ClinicalGPT: Large Language Models Finetuned with Diverse Medical Data and Comprehensive Evaluationcited by 85
  11. 2020A Comprehensive Survey on Word Representation Models: From Classical to State-Of-The-Art Word Representation Language Modelscited by 30
  12. 2023ScandEval: A Benchmark for Scandinavian Natural Language Processingcited by 16
3 more
  1. 2018Natural Language Processing for Information Extractioncited by 14
  2. 2023A Review of Hybrid and Ensemble in Deep Learning for Natural Language Processingcited by 3
  3. 2020Building a Norwegian Lexical Resource for Medical Entity Recognitioncited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.