PALATE: Peculiar Application of the Law of Total Expectation to Enhance the Evaluation of Deep Generative Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep generative models (DGMs) have caused a paradigm shift in the field of machine learning, yielding noteworthy advancements in domains such as image synthesis, natural language processing, and other related areas. However, a comprehensive evaluation of these models that accounts for the trichotomy between fidelity, diversity, and novelty in generated samples remains a formidable challenge. A recently introduced solution that has emerged as a promising approach in this regard is the Feature Likelihood Divergence (FLD), a method that offers a theoretically motivated practical tool, yet also exhibits some computational challenges. In this paper, we propose PALATE, a novel enhancement to the evaluation of DGMs that addresses limitations of existing metrics. Our approach is based on a peculiar application of the law of total expectation to random variables representing accessible real data. When combined with the MMD baseline metric and DINOv2 feature extractor, PALATE offers a holistic evaluation framework that matches or surpasses state-of-the-art solutions while providing superior computational efficiency and scalability to large-scale datasets. Through a series of experiments, we demonstrate the effectiveness of the PALATE enhancement, contributing a computationally efficient, holistic evaluation approach that advances the field of DGMs assessment, especially in detecting sample memorization and evaluating generalization capabilities.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Mar 2025.
Builds on
14 of 22 references.
References · 14
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,863
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
- 2016Improved Techniques for Training GANscited by 2,970
- 2018Demystifying MMD GANscited by 1,293
- 2018Assessing Generative Models via Precision and Recallcited by 406
- 2023Rethinking FID: Towards a Better Evaluation Metric for Image Generationcited by 310
- 2023Exposing flaws of generative model evaluation metrics and their unfair treatment of diffusion modelscited by 205
- 2021How Faithful is your Synthetic Data? Sample-level Metrics for Evaluating and Auditing Generative Modelscited by 196
- 2022It's Raw! Audio Generation with State-Space Modelscited by 171
- 2020A Non-Parametric Test to Detect Data-Copying in Generative Modelscited by 52
Built on by
Not cited yet.