mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

IceBench: A Benchmark for Deep Learning based Sea Ice Type Classification

arXiv 2503.17877 ↗First posted 22 Mar 2025cs.CV cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Sea ice plays a critical role in the global climate system and maritime operations, making timely and accurate classification essential. However, traditional manual methods are time-consuming, costly, and have inherent biases. Automating sea ice type classification addresses these challenges by enabling faster, more consistent, and scalable analysis. While both traditional and deep learning approaches have been explored, deep learning models offer a promising direction for improving efficiency and consistency in sea ice classification. However, the absence of a standardized benchmark and comparative study prevents a clear consensus on the best-performing models. To bridge this gap, we introduce textitIceBench, a comprehensive benchmarking framework for sea ice type classification. Our key contributions are threefold: First, we establish the IceBench benchmarking framework which leverages the existing AI4Arctic Sea Ice Challenge dataset as a standardized dataset, incorporates a comprehensive set of evaluation metrics, and includes representative models from the entire spectrum of sea ice type classification methods categorized in two distinct groups, namely, pixel-based classification methods and patch-based classification methods. IceBench is open-source and allows for convenient integration and evaluation of other sea ice type classification methods; hence, facilitating comparative evaluation of new methods and improving reproducibility in the field. Second, we conduct an in-depth comparative study on representative models to assess their strengths and limitations, providing insights for both practitioners and researchers. Third, we leverage IceBench for systematic experiments addressing key research questions on model transferability across seasons (time) and locations (space), data downscaling, and preprocessing strategies.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Mar 2025.

Builds on

14 of 72 references.

References · 14

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  4. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  5. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  6. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  7. 2016DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFscited by 3,239
  8. 2018Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 3,210
  9. 2017Rethinking Atrous Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 2,154
  10. 2020Benchmarking Graph Neural Networkscited by 672
  11. 2014Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets and Fully Connected CRFscited by 552
  12. 2019BigEarthNet: A Large-Scale Benchmark Archive For Remote Sensing Image Understandingcited by 231
2 more
  1. 2021Benchmarking and scaling of deep learning models for land cover image classificationcited by 14
  2. 2023Enhancing sea ice segmentation in Sentinel-1 images with atrous convolutionscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 4.

5 papers.