mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Enhancing sea ice segmentation in Sentinel-1 images with atrous convolutions

arXiv 2310.17122 ↗First posted 26 Oct 2023eess.IV cs.CVcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Due to the growing volume of remote sensing data and the low latency required for safe marine navigation, machine learning (ML) algorithms are being developed to accelerate sea ice chart generation, currently a manual interpretation task. However, the low signal-to-noise ratio of the freely available Sentinel-1 Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) imagery, the ambiguity of backscatter signals for ice types, and the scarcity of open-source high-resolution labelled data makes automating sea ice mapping challenging. We use Extreme Earth version 2, a high-resolution benchmark dataset generated for ML training and evaluation, to investigate the effectiveness of ML for automated sea ice mapping. Our customized pipeline combines ResNets and Atrous Spatial Pyramid Pooling for SAR image segmentation. We investigate the performance of our model for: i) binary classification of sea ice and open water in a segmentation framework; and ii) a multiclass segmentation of five sea ice types. For binary ice-water classification, models trained with our largest training set have weighted F1 scores all greater than 0.95 for January and July test scenes. Specifically, the median weighted F1 score was 0.98, indicating high performance for both months. By comparison, a competitive baseline U-Net has a weighted average F1 score of ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 (median 0.93) for July, and 0.97 to 0.98 (median 0.97) for January. Multiclass ice type classification is more challenging, and even though our models achieve 2% improvement in weighted F1 average compared to the baseline U-Net, test weighted F1 is generally between 0.6 and 0.80. Our approach can efficiently segment full SAR scenes in one run, is faster than the baseline U-Net, retains spatial resolution and dimension, and is more robust against noise compared to approaches that rely on patch classification.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Oct 2023.

Builds on

11 of 62 references.

References · 11

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  4. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  5. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  6. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,290
  7. 2017Rethinking Atrous Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 2,161
  8. 2014How transferable are features in deep neural networks?cited by 1,225
  9. 2015Multi-Scale Context Aggregation by Dilated Convolutionscited by 1,133
  10. 2014Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognitioncited by 720
  11. 2014Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets and Fully Connected CRFscited by 554

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

7 papers.