mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ConSol: Sequential Probability Ratio Testing to Find Consistent LLM Reasoning Paths Efficiently

arXiv 2503.17587 ↗First posted 22 Mar 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 2

On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) integrating explicit reasoning, such as OpenAI's o3-mini, DeepSeek-R1, and QWQ-32B, enable smaller models to solve complex tasks by generating intermediate reasoning steps prior to providing answers. However, this approach significantly increases computational costs, both monetarily and environmentally. The widely-used self-consistency method further exacerbates these costs by aggregating multiple reasoning paths to improve accuracy, often requiring between 40 to 64 samples per task. Although aggregation effectively reduces variance and bias, additional sampling can lead to diminishing returns when early samples yield consistent results. To address inefficiencies, we propose leveraging Sequential Probability Ratio Testing (SPRT) to dynamically terminate sampling once sufficient consistency is achieved. We calibrate SPRT parameters specifically for LLM applications, accounting for sensitivity to detect the mode of the distribution. Our experiments demonstrate that incorporating SPRT significantly enhances token efficiency, achieving comparable accuracy to self-consistency methods but at a substantially reduced computational cost. To promote transparency and facilitate reproducibility, we have made the source code and datasets used in our experiments publicly available at our GitHub repository: https://github.com/LiuzLab/consol, or available as a PyPI package: pip install consol. We hope that this resource will support further research and encourage the development of new methods building upon our work.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 5 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Mar 2025.

Builds on

5 of 15 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Let's Sample Step by Step: Adaptive-Consistency for Efficient Reasoning and Coding with LLMs19 May

Other references · 4

  1. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  2. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
  3. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  4. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025A Theoretical Study on Bridging Internal Probability and Self-Consistency for LLM Reasoning
  2. 2025Bridging Internal Probability and Self-Consistency for Effective and Efficient LLM Reasoning
  3. 2025Self-Consistency Is Losing Its Edge: Diminishing Returns and Rising Costs in Modern LLMs
  4. 2025Sample Smart, Not Hard: Correctness-First Decoding for Better Reasoning in LLMs
  5. 2024Reasoning Aware Self-Consistency: Leveraging Reasoning Paths for Efficient LLM Sampling
  6. 2024Path-Consistency with Prefix Enhancement for Efficient Inference in LLMs
  7. 2026Self-Consistency from Only Two Samples: CoT-PoT Ensembling for Efficient LLM Reasoning
  8. 2026Refining Over Resampling: Test-Time Self-Correction for LLM Reasoning