mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Understanding-informed Bias Mitigation for Fair CMR Segmentation

arXiv 2503.17089 ↗First posted 21 Mar 2025eess.IV cs.AI cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being used for medical imaging tasks. However, there can be biases in AI models, particularly when they are trained using imbalanced training datasets. One such example has been the strong ethnicity bias effect in cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) image segmentation models. Although this phenomenon has been reported in a number of publications, little is known about the effectiveness of bias mitigation algorithms in this domain. We aim to investigate the impact of common bias mitigation methods to address bias between Black and White subjects in AI-based CMR segmentation models. Specifically, we use oversampling, importance reweighing and Group DRO as well as combinations of these techniques to mitigate the ethnicity bias. Second, motivated by recent findings on the root causes of AI-based CMR segmentation bias, we evaluate the same methods using models trained and evaluated on cropped CMR images. We find that bias can be mitigated using oversampling, significantly improving performance for the underrepresented Black subjects whilst not significantly reducing the majority White subjects' performance. Using cropped images increases performance for both ethnicities and reduces the bias, whilst adding oversampling as a bias mitigation technique with cropped images reduces the bias further. When testing the models on an external clinical validation set, we find high segmentation performance and no statistically significant bias.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Mar 2025.

Builds on

22 of 45 references.

References · 22

  1. 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,277
  2. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
  3. 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,247
  4. 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
  5. 2018Learning Adversarially Fair and Transferable Representationscited by 353
  6. 2020CheXclusion: Fairness gaps in deep chest X-ray classifierscited by 153
  7. 2020Minimax Pareto Fairness: A Multi Objective Perspectivecited by 153
  8. 2021Disparities in Dermatology AI: Assessments Using Diverse Clinical Imagescited by 134
  9. 2018Bias Mitigation Post-processing for Individual and Group Fairnesscited by 72
  10. 2022MEDFAIR: Benchmarking Fairness for Medical Imagingcited by 68
  11. 2021Fairness in Cardiac MR Image Analysis: An Investigation of Bias Due to Data Imbalance in Deep Learning Based Segmentationcited by 57
  12. 2022Improving the Fairness of Chest X-ray Classifierscited by 52
10 more
  1. 2022Diagnosing failures of fairness transfer across distribution shift in real-world medical settingscited by 45
  2. 2020Risk of Training Diagnostic Algorithms on Data with Demographic Biascited by 23
  3. 2022Feature robustness and sex differences in medical imaging: a case study in MRI-based Alzheimer's disease detectioncited by 19
  4. 2022A Study of Demographic Bias in CNN-based Brain MR Segmentationcited by 16
  5. 2022Bias in Machine Learning Models Can Be Significantly Mitigated by Careful Training: Evidence from Neuroimaging Studiescited by 14
  6. 2024Slicing Through Bias: Explaining Performance Gaps in Medical Image Analysis using Slice Discovery Methodscited by 14
  7. 2022A systematic study of race and sex bias in CNN-based cardiac MR segmentationcited by 9
  8. 2023An investigation into the impact of deep learning model choice on sex and race bias in cardiac MR segmentationcited by 8
  9. 2024PASSION for Dermatology: Bridging the Diversity Gap with Pigmented Skin Images from Sub-Saharan Africacited by 5
  10. 2024An investigation into the causes of race bias in AI-based cine CMR segmentationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.