Data-Driven Optimization of EV Charging Station Placement Using Causal Discovery
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper addresses the critical challenge of optimizing electric vehicle charging station placement through a novel data-driven methodology employing causal discovery techniques. While traditional approaches prioritize economic factors or power grid constraints, they often neglect empirical charging patterns that ultimately determine station utilization. We analyze extensive charging data from Palo Alto and Boulder (337,344 events across 100 stations) to uncover latent relationships between station characteristics and utilization. Applying structural learning algorithms (NOTEARS and DAGMA) to this data reveals that charging demand is primarily determined by three factors: proximity to amenities, EV registration density, and adjacency to high-traffic routes. These findings, consistent across multiple algorithms and urban contexts, challenge conventional infrastructure distribution strategies. We develop an optimization framework that translates these insights into actionable placement recommendations, identifying locations likely to experience high utilization based on the discovered dependency structures. The resulting site selection model prioritizes strategic clustering in high-amenity areas with substantial EV populations rather than uniform spatial distribution. Our approach contributes a framework that integrates empirical charging behavior into infrastructure planning, potentially enhancing both station utilization and user convenience. By focusing on data-driven insights instead of theoretical distribution models, we provide a more effective strategy for expanding charging networks that can adjust to various stages of EV market development.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Mar 2025.
Builds on
8 of 24 references.
References · 8
- 2018DAGs with NO TEARS: Continuous Optimization for Structure Learningcited by 752
- 2021Beware of the Simulated DAG! Causal Discovery Benchmarks May Be Easy To Gamecited by 161
- 2022DAGMA: Learning DAGs via M-matrices and a Log-Determinant Acyclicity Characterizationcited by 140
- 2024Spatial-Temporal Large Language Model for Traffic Predictioncited by 83
- 2023MM-DAG: Multi-task DAG Learning for Multi-modal Data -- with Application for Traffic Congestion Analysiscited by 13
- 2023Dynamic Causal Graph Convolutional Network for Traffic Predictioncited by 12
- 2024MultiFun-DAG: Multivariate Functional Directed Acyclic Graphcited by 4
- 2024Deep Causal Learning to Explain and Quantify The Geo-Tension's Impact on Natural Gas Marketcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.