mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Neural-Guided Equation Discovery

arXiv 2503.16953 ↗First posted 21 Mar 2025cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → Interpretable and logic-guided RL

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep learning approaches are becoming increasingly attractive for equation discovery. We show the advantages and disadvantages of using neural-guided equation discovery by giving an overview of recent papers and the results of experiments using our modular equation discovery system MGMT (Multi-Task Grammar-Guided Monte-Carlo Tree Search for Equation Discovery). The system uses neural-guided Monte-Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) and supports both supervised and reinforcement learning, with a search space defined by a context-free grammar. We summarize seven desirable properties of equation discovery systems, emphasizing the importance of embedding tabular data sets for such learning approaches. Using the modular structure of MGMT, we compare seven architectures (among them, RNNs, CNNs, and Transformers) for embedding tabular datasets on the auxiliary task of contrastive learning for tabular data sets on an equation discovery task. For almost all combinations of modules, supervised learning outperforms reinforcement learning. Moreover, our experiments indicate an advantage of using grammar rules as action space instead of tokens. Two adaptations of MCTS -- risk-seeking MCTS and AmEx-MCTS -- can improve equation discovery with that kind of search.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Interpretable and logic-guided RL, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 27 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Mar 2025.

Builds on

27 of 54 references.

References · 27

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2016PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentationcited by 5,248
  3. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,829
  4. 2023A Comprehensive Survey of Continual Learning: Theory, Method and Applicationcited by 872
  5. 2019AI Feynman: a Physics-Inspired Method for Symbolic Regressioncited by 548
  6. 2017Deep learning for universal linear embeddings of nonlinear dynamicscited by 494
  7. 2019Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradientscited by 309
  8. 2017Grammar Variational Autoencodercited by 285
  9. 2019Deep Learning for Symbolic Mathematicscited by 270
  10. 2018code2vec: Learning Distributed Representations of Codecited by 250
  11. 2022End-to-end symbolic regression with transformerscited by 203
  12. 2021Neural Symbolic Regression that Scalescited by 192
15 more
  1. 2022On Embeddings for Numerical Features in Tabular Deep Learningcited by 186
  2. 2018Learning Equations for Extrapolation and Controlcited by 156
  3. 2020AI Feynman 2.0: Pareto-optimal symbolic regression exploiting graph modularitycited by 144
  4. 2021Self-Attention Between Datapoints: Going Beyond Individual Input-Output Pairs in Deep Learningcited by 113
  5. 2022Interpretable Scientific Discovery with Symbolic Regression: A Reviewcited by 105
  6. 2021Symbolic Regression via Neural-Guided Genetic Programming Population Seedingcited by 101
  7. 2023Transformer-based Planning for Symbolic Regressioncited by 79
  8. 2019Bayesian Symbolic Regressioncited by 78
  9. 2020A Bayesian machine scientist to aid in the solution of challenging scientific problemscited by 61
  10. 2023Deep Generative Symbolic Regression with Monte-Carlo-Tree-Searchcited by 41
  11. 2019Dataset2Vec: Learning Dataset Meta-Featurescited by 38
  12. 2020Probabilistic Grammars for Equation Discoverycited by 36
  13. 2023Controllable Neural Symbolic Regressioncited by 20
  14. 2023Efficient Generator of Mathematical Expressions for Symbolic Regressioncited by 13
  15. 2024Amplifying Exploration in Monte-Carlo Tree Search by Focusing on the Unknowncited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Bridging the Domain Gap in Equation Distillation with Reinforcement Feedback
  2. 2026Test-Time Scaling for Scientific Equation Discovery
  3. 2025SR-Scientist: Scientific Equation Discovery With Agentic AI
  4. 2025Deep Symbolic Optimization: Reinforcement Learning for Symbolic Mathematics
  5. 2026Reinforcement Learning for Symbolic Equation Solving
  6. 2022Symbolic Physics Learner: Discovering governing equations via Monte Carlo tree search
  7. 2026STRIDE: A Self-Reflective Agent Framework for Reliable Automatic Equation Discovery
  8. 2025DrSR: LLM based Scientific Equation Discovery with Dual Reasoning from Data and Experience