Ensemble Survival Analysis for Preclinical Cognitive Decline Prediction in Alzheimer's Disease Using Longitudinal Biomarkers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Predicting the risk of clinical progression from cognitively normal (CN) status to mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or Alzheimer's disease (AD) is critical for early intervention in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Traditional survival models often fail to capture complex longitudinal biomarker patterns associated with disease progression. We propose an ensemble survival analysis framework integrating multiple survival models to improve early prediction of clinical progression in initially cognitively normal individuals. We analyzed longitudinal biomarker data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) cohort, including 721 participants, limiting analysis to up to three visits (baseline, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up). Of these, 142 (19.7%) experienced clinical progression to MCI or AD. Our approach combined penalized Cox regression (LASSO, Elastic Net) with advanced survival models (Random Survival Forest, DeepSurv, XGBoost). Model predictions were aggregated using ensemble averaging and Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA). Predictive performance was assessed using Harrell's concordance index (C-index) and time-dependent area under the curve (AUC). The ensemble model achieved a peak C-index of 0.907 and an integrated time-dependent AUC of 0.904, outperforming baseline-only models (C-index 0.608). One follow-up visit after baseline significantly improved prediction accuracy (48.1% C-index, 48.2% AUC gains), while adding a second follow-up provided only marginal gains (2.1% C-index, 2.7% AUC). Our ensemble survival framework effectively integrates diverse survival models and aggregation techniques to enhance early prediction of preclinical AD progression. These findings highlight the importance of leveraging longitudinal biomarker data, particularly one follow-up visit, for accurate risk stratification and personalized intervention strategies.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Mar 2025.
Builds on
4 of 37 references.
References · 4
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
- 2016DeepSurv: Personalized Treatment Recommender System Using A Cox Proportional Hazards Deep Neural Networkcited by 354
- 2017Using stacking to average Bayesian predictive distributionscited by 39
- 2020Ensemble methods for survival function estimation with time-varying covariatescited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2025Position: Stop Chasing the C-index when Evaluating Survival Analysis Modelscited by 5
- 2026Human vs. Machine Deception: Distinguishing AI-Generated and Human-Written Fake News Using Ensemble Learningcited by 1
- 2025Integrating Causal Inference with Graph Neural Networks for Alzheimer's Disease Analysiscited by 0
- 2026Cross-Prompt Generalization in Detecting AI-Generated Fake News Using Interpretable Linguistic Featurescited by 0
- 2026Cross-Prompt Generalization in Detecting AI-Generated Fake News Using Interpretable Linguistic Features2 Jun 2026
- 2026Human vs. Machine Deception: Distinguishing AI-Generated and Human-Written Fake News Using Ensemble Learning10 Apr 2026
- 2025Integrating Causal Inference with Graph Neural Networks for Alzheimer's Disease Analysis18 Nov 2025
- 2025Position: Stop Chasing the C-index when Evaluating Survival Analysis Models2 Jun 2025