Investigating Retrieval-Augmented Generation in Quranic Studies: A Study of 13 Open-Source Large Language Models
On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → RAG robustness and adaptive retrieval
Abstract (arXiv)
Accurate and contextually faithful responses are critical when applying large language models (LLMs) to sensitive and domain-specific tasks, such as answering queries related to quranic studies. General-purpose LLMs often struggle with hallucinations, where generated responses deviate from authoritative sources, raising concerns about their reliability in religious contexts. This challenge highlights the need for systems that can integrate domain-specific knowledge while maintaining response accuracy, relevance, and faithfulness. In this study, we investigate 13 open-source LLMs categorized into large (e.g., Llama3:70b, Gemma2:27b, QwQ:32b), medium (e.g., Gemma2:9b, Llama3:8b), and small (e.g., Llama3.2:3b, Phi3:3.8b). A Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is used to make up for the problems that come with using separate models. This research utilizes a descriptive dataset of Quranic surahs including the meanings, historical context, and qualities of the 114 surahs, allowing the model to gather relevant knowledge before responding. The models are evaluated using three key metrics set by human evaluators: context relevance, answer faithfulness, and answer relevance. The findings reveal that large models consistently outperform smaller models in capturing query semantics and producing accurate, contextually grounded responses. The Llama3.2:3b model, even though it is considered small, does very well on faithfulness (4.619) and relevance (4.857), showing the promise of smaller architectures that have been well optimized. This article examines the trade-offs between model size, computational efficiency, and response quality while using LLMs in domain-specific applications.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RAG robustness and adaptive retrieval, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 29 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Mar 2025.
Builds on
29 of 41 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2024To Trust or Not to Trust? Enhancing Large Language Models' Situated Faithfulness to External Contexts18 Oct
- 2024Trustworthiness in Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems: A Survey16 Sep
- 2022Improving the Domain Adaptation of Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) Models for Open Domain Question Answering6 Oct
Other references · 26
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
- 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,344
- 2023Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 2,212
- 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,998
- 2024Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model Locally on Your Phonecited by 1,917
- 2024A Survey on RAG Meeting LLMs: Towards Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Modelscited by 452
- 2024A Comprehensive Survey of Hallucination Mitigation Techniques in Large Language Modelscited by 269
- 2024LegalBench-RAG: A Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation in the Legal Domaincited by 118
- 2023Evaluating Open-Domain Question Answering in the Era of Large Language Modelscited by 111
- 2024ReDeEP: Detecting Hallucination in Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 101
14 more
- 2023Context-faithful Prompting for Large Language Modelscited by 80
- 2024Datasets for Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 71
- 2024A Comprehensive Survey of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG): Evolution, Current Landscape and Future Directionscited by 70
- 2023A Comprehensive Survey on Vector Database: Storage and Retrieval Technique, Challengecited by 55
- 2024What is the Role of Small Models in the LLM Era: A Surveycited by 41
- 2024When Large Language Models Meet Vector Databases: A Surveycited by 39
- 2023Evaluating Open-QA Evaluationcited by 35
- 2024Open-RAG: Enhanced Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning with Open-Source Large Language Modelscited by 25
- 2024Quantifying the Capabilities of LLMs across Scale and Precisioncited by 19
- 2024Sample-Efficient Human Evaluation of Large Language Models via Maximum Discrepancy Competitioncited by 18
- 2023QASiNa: Religious Domain Question Answering using Sirah Nabawiyahcited by 15
- 2024ConSiDERS-The-Human Evaluation Framework: Rethinking Human Evaluation for Generative Large Language Modelscited by 15
- 2024VectorSearch: Enhancing Document Retrieval with Semantic Embeddings and Optimized Searchcited by 10
- 2023Building Domain-Specific LLMs Faithful To The Islamic Worldview: Mirage or Technical Possibility?cited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Grounding Arabic LLMs in the Doha Historical Dictionary: Retrieval-Augmented Understanding of Quran and Hadith
- 2025FARSIQA: Faithful and Advanced RAG System for Islamic Question Answering
- 2026Islamic Large Language Models: From Knowledge Acquisition to Trustworthy and Hallucination-Resistant AI
- 2024Improving LLM Reliability with RAG in Religious Question-Answering: MufassirQAS
- 2026Ansari: A Retrieval-Grounded Islamic AI Assistant -- Architecture, Deployment, and Lessons from 140,000 Conversations
- 2024Ancient Wisdom, Modern Tools: Exploring Retrieval-Augmented LLMs for Ancient Indian Philosophy
- 2026SectEval: Evaluating the Latent Sectarian Preferences of Large Language Models
- 2026What Makes a Good Fiqh Retriever? Answer Retrieval for Arabic Islamic Jurisprudence