mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Improving LLM Reliability with RAG in Religious Question-Answering: MufassirQAS

arXiv 2401.15378 ↗First posted 27 Jan 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Religious teachings can sometimes be complex and challenging to grasp, but chatbots can serve as effective assistants in this domain. Large Language Model (LLM) based chatbots, powered by Natural Language Processing (NLP), can connect related topics and provide well-supported responses to intricate questions, making them valuable tools for religious education. However, LLMs are prone to hallucinations as they can generate inaccurate or irrelevant information, and these can include sensitive content that could be offensive, inappropriate, or controversial. Addressing such topics without inadvertently promoting hate speech or disrespecting certain beliefs remains a significant challenge. As a solution to these issues, we introduce MufassirQAS, a system that enhances LLM accuracy and transparency using a vector database-driven Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) approach. We built a dataset comprising fundamental books containing Turkish translations and interpretations of Islamic texts. This database is leveraged to answer religious inquiries while ensuring that responses remain reliable and contextually grounded. Our system also presents the relevant dataset sections alongside the LLM-generated answers, reinforcing transparency. We carefully designed system prompts to prevent harmful, offensive, or disrespectful outputs, ensuring that responses align with ethical and respectful discourse. Moreover, MufassirQAS provides supplementary details, such as source page numbers and referenced articles, to enhance credibility. To evaluate its effectiveness, we tested MufassirQAS against ChatGPT with sensitive questions, and our system demonstrated superior performance in maintaining accuracy and reliability. Future work will focus on improving accuracy and refining prompt engineering techniques to further minimize biases and ensure even more reliable responses.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jan 2024.

Builds on

6 of 37 references.

References · 6

  1. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  2. 2021Improving language models by retrieving from trillions of tokenscited by 1,278
  3. 2022When Not to Trust Language Models: Investigating Effectiveness of Parametric and Non-Parametric Memoriescited by 1,103
  4. 2023In-Context Retrieval-Augmented Language Modelscited by 694
  5. 2023Fine-Tuning or Retrieval? Comparing Knowledge Injection in LLMscited by 175
  6. 2024Reinforcement Learning for Optimizing RAG for Domain Chatbotscited by 26

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 3.

6 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025FARSIQA: Faithful and Advanced RAG System for Islamic Question Answering
  2. 2026From RAG to Agentic RAG for Faithful Islamic Question Answering
  3. 2025Investigating Retrieval-Augmented Generation in Quranic Studies: A Study of 13 Open-Source Large Language Models
  4. 2026Islamic Large Language Models: From Knowledge Acquisition to Trustworthy and Hallucination-Resistant AI
  5. 2024Adversarial Databases Improve Success in Retrieval-based Large Language Models
  6. 2024Enhancing LLM Factual Accuracy with RAG to Counter Hallucinations: A Case Study on Domain-Specific Queries in Private Knowledge-Bases
  7. 2024ELOQ: Resources for Enhancing LLM Detection of Out-of-Scope Questions
  8. 2024Evaluating the Retrieval Component in LLM-Based Question Answering Systems