Evaluating quality metrics through the lenses of psychophysical measurements of low-level vision

Image and video quality metrics, such as SSIM, LPIPS, and VMAF, aim to predict perceived visual quality and are often assumed to reflect principles of human vision. However, relatively few metrics explicitly incorporate models of human perception, with most relying on hand-crafted formulas or data-driven training to approximate perceptual alignment. In this paper, we introduce a set of tests for full-reference quality metrics that evaluate their ability to capture key aspects of low-level human vision: contrast sensitivity, contrast masking, and contrast matching. These tests provide an additional framework for assessing both established and newly proposed metrics. We apply the tests to 34 existing quality metrics and highlight patterns in their behavior, including the ability of LPIPS and MS-SSIM to predict contrast masking and the tendency of SSIM to overemphasize high spatial frequencies, which is mitigated in MS-SSIM, and the general inability of metrics to model supra-threshold contrast constancy. Our results demonstrate how these tests can reveal properties of quality metrics that are not easily observed with standard evaluation protocols.