mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Improving Complex Reasoning with Dynamic Prompt Corruption: A soft prompt Optimization Approach

arXiv 2503.13208 ↗First posted 17 Mar 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 9

On the map: LLM reasoning → Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Prompt-tuning (PT) for large language models (LLMs) can facilitate the performance on various conventional NLP tasks with significantly fewer trainable parameters. However, our investigation reveals that PT provides limited improvement and may even degrade the primitive performance of LLMs on complex reasoning tasks. Such a phenomenon suggests that soft prompts can positively impact certain instances while negatively affecting others, particularly during the later phases of reasoning. To address these challenges, We first identify an information accumulation within the soft prompts. Through detailed analysis, we demonstrate that this phenomenon is often accompanied by erroneous information flow patterns in the deeper layers of the model, which ultimately lead to incorrect reasoning outcomes. we propose a novel method called Dynamic Prompt Corruption (DPC) to take better advantage of soft prompts in complex reasoning tasks, which dynamically adjusts the influence of soft prompts based on their impact on the reasoning process. Specifically, DPC consists of two stages: Dynamic Trigger and Dynamic Corruption. First, Dynamic Trigger measures the impact of soft prompts, identifying whether beneficial or detrimental. Then, Dynamic Corruption mitigates the negative effects of soft prompts by selectively masking key tokens that interfere with the reasoning process. We validate the proposed approach through extensive experiments on various LLMs and reasoning tasks, including GSM8K, MATH, and AQuA. Experimental results demonstrate that DPC can consistently enhance the performance of PT, achieving 4%-8% accuracy gains compared to vanilla prompt tuning, highlighting the effectiveness of our approach and its potential to enhance complex reasoning in LLMs.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 13 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Mar 2025.

Builds on

13 of 36 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Instance-adaptive Zero-shot Chain-of-Thought Prompting30 Sep

Other references · 12

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  2. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  3. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  4. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
  5. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,795
  6. 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,164
  7. 2023Efficient Streaming Language Models with Attention Sinkscited by 2,186
  8. 2021GPT Understands, Toocited by 716
  9. 2024Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Large Models: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 656
  10. 2024Unveiling and Harnessing Hidden Attention Sinks: Enhancing Large Language Models without Training through Attention Calibrationcited by 74
  11. 2021Exploring Universal Intrinsic Task Subspace via Prompt Tuningcited by 25
  12. 2023Dynamic Prompting: A Unified Framework for Prompt Tuningcited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 6; 2026: 3.

9 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Beyond Prompt Engineering: A Systematic Analysis of Prompt Lexical Sensitivity and Its Impacts on Quality
  2. 2024Think Beyond Size: Adaptive Prompting for More Effective Reasoning
  3. 2026Why Prompt Optimization Works, and Why It Sometimes Doesn't: A Causal-Inspired Edit-Level Analysis
  4. 2023Noisy Exemplars Make Large Language Models More Robust: A Domain-Agnostic Behavioral Analysis
  5. 2026Lexical Perturbations Disrupt LLM Reasoning: An Empirical Study of Attention Diversion
  6. 2026Beyond the Prompt in Large Language Models: Comprehension, In-Context Learning, and Chain-of-Thought
  7. 2026STEVE: Stabilizing Textual Gradient-Based Prompt Optimization via Error-Driven Refinement and Regularized Verification
  8. 2025Robustness of Prompting: Enhancing Robustness of Large Language Models Against Prompting Attacks