mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Who Wrote This? Identifying Machine vs Human-Generated Text in Hausa

arXiv 2503.13101 ↗First posted 17 Mar 2025cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The advancement of large language models (LLMs) has allowed them to be proficient in various tasks, including content generation. However, their unregulated usage can lead to malicious activities such as plagiarism and generating and spreading fake news, especially for low-resource languages. Most existing machine-generated text detectors are trained on high-resource languages like English, French, etc. In this study, we developed the first large-scale detector that can distinguish between human- and machine-generated content in Hausa. We scrapped seven Hausa-language media outlets for the human-generated text and the Gemini-2.0 flash model to automatically generate the corresponding Hausa-language articles based on the human-generated article headlines. We fine-tuned four pre-trained Afri-centric models (AfriTeVa, AfriBERTa, AfroXLMR, and AfroXLMR-76L) on the resulting dataset and assessed their performance using accuracy and F1-score metrics. AfroXLMR achieved the highest performance with an accuracy of 99.23% and an F1 score of 99.21%, demonstrating its effectiveness for Hausa text detection. Our dataset is made publicly available to enable further research.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Mar 2025.

Builds on

14 of 20 references.

References · 14

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  3. 2019Plug and Play Language Models: A Simple Approach to Controlled Text Generationcited by 793
  4. 2019Defending Against Neural Fake Newscited by 553
  5. 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 490
  6. 2019Automatic Detection of Generated Text is Easiest when Humans are Fooledcited by 260
  7. 2022Adapting Pre-trained Language Models to African Languages via Multilingual Adaptive Fine-Tuningcited by 149
  8. 2023SIB-200: A Simple, Inclusive, and Big Evaluation Dataset for Topic Classification in 200+ Languages and Dialectscited by 149
  9. 2023M4: Multi-generator, Multi-domain, and Multi-lingual Black-Box Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 118
  10. 2023ChatGPT or Human? Detect and Explain. Explaining Decisions of Machine Learning Model for Detecting Short ChatGPT-generated Textcited by 84
  11. 2020AraGPT2: Pre-Trained Transformer for Arabic Language Generationcited by 54
  12. 2024Detecting Machine-Generated Texts: Not Just "AI vs Humans" and Explainability is Complicatedcited by 15
2 more
  1. 2021The first large scale collection of diverse Hausa language datasetscited by 6
  2. 2024MUGC: Machine Generated versus User Generated Content Detectioncited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.