An Optimization Framework for Differentially Private Sparse Fine-Tuning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Differentially private stochastic gradient descent (DP-SGD) is broadly considered to be the gold standard for training and fine-tuning neural networks under differential privacy (DP). With the increasing availability of high-quality pre-trained model checkpoints (e.g., vision and language models), fine-tuning has become a popular strategy. However, despite recent progress in understanding and applying DP-SGD for private transfer learning tasks, significant challenges remain -- most notably, the performance gap between models fine-tuned with DP-SGD and their non-private counterparts. Sparse fine-tuning on private data has emerged as an alternative to full-model fine-tuning; recent work has shown that privately fine-tuning only a small subset of model weights and keeping the rest of the weights fixed can lead to better performance. In this work, we propose a new approach for sparse fine-tuning of neural networks under DP. Existing work on private sparse finetuning often used fixed choice of trainable weights (e.g., updating only the last layer), or relied on public model's weights to choose the subset of weights to modify. Such choice of weights remains suboptimal. In contrast, we explore an optimization-based approach, where our selection method makes use of the private gradient information, while using off the shelf privacy accounting techniques. Our numerical experiments on several computer vision models and datasets show that our selection method leads to better prediction accuracy, compared to full-model private fine-tuning or existing private sparse fine-tuning approaches.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Mar 2025.
Builds on
23 of 37 references.
References · 23
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,560
- 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
- 2021Large Language Models Can Be Strong Differentially Private Learnerscited by 405
- 2021Differentially Private Fine-tuning of Language Modelscited by 392
- 2021Opacus: User-Friendly Differential Privacy Library in PyTorchcited by 375
- 2022Optimal Brain Compression: A Framework for Accurate Post-Training Quantization and Pruningcited by 317
- 2020Differentially Private Learning Needs Better Features (or Much More Data)cited by 233
- 2022Unlocking High-Accuracy Differentially Private Image Classification through Scalecited by 218
- 2019R'enyi Differential Privacy of the Sampled Gaussian Mechanismcited by 199
- 2021Numerical Composition of Differential Privacycited by 174
11 more
- 2021On the Effectiveness of Adapter-based Tuning for Pretrained Language Model Adaptationcited by 147
- 2018Interactive Supercomputing on 40,000 Cores for Machine Learning and Data Analysiscited by 110
- 2022Toward Training at ImageNet Scale with Differential Privacycited by 87
- 2021Do Not Let Privacy Overbill Utility: Gradient Embedding Perturbation for Private Learningcited by 86
- 2023(Amplified) Banded Matrix Factorization: A unified approach to private trainingcited by 49
- 2022When Does Differentially Private Learning Not Suffer in High Dimensions?cited by 48
- 2022Large Scale Transfer Learning for Differentially Private Image Classificationcited by 40
- 2023Fast as CHITA: Neural Network Pruning with Combinatorial Optimizationcited by 40
- 2023Why Is Public Pretraining Necessary for Private Model Training?cited by 36
- 2021Towards Understanding the Impact of Model Size on Differential Private Classificationcited by 10
- 2023Pre-Pruning and Gradient-Dropping Improve Differentially Private Image Classificationcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.