mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PrivacyScalpel: Enhancing LLM Privacy via Interpretable Feature Intervention with Sparse Autoencoders

arXiv 2503.11232 ↗First posted 14 Mar 2025cs.LG cs.CLcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in natural language processing but also pose significant privacy risks by memorizing and leaking Personally Identifiable Information (PII). Existing mitigation strategies, such as differential privacy and neuron-level interventions, often degrade model utility or fail to effectively prevent leakage. To address this challenge, we introduce PrivacyScalpel, a novel privacy-preserving framework that leverages LLM interpretability techniques to identify and mitigate PII leakage while maintaining performance. PrivacyScalpel comprises three key steps: (1) Feature Probing, which identifies layers in the model that encode PII-rich representations, (2) Sparse Autoencoding, where a k-Sparse Autoencoder (k-SAE) disentangles and isolates privacy-sensitive features, and (3) Feature-Level Interventions, which employ targeted ablation and vector steering to suppress PII leakage. Our empirical evaluation on Gemma2-2b and Llama2-7b, fine-tuned on the Enron dataset, shows that PrivacyScalpel significantly reduces email leakage from 5.15% to as low as 0.0%, while maintaining over 99.4% of the original model's utility. Notably, our method outperforms neuron-level interventions in privacy-utility trade-offs, demonstrating that acting on sparse, monosemantic features is more effective than manipulating polysemantic neurons. Beyond improving LLM privacy, our approach offers insights into the mechanisms underlying PII memorization, contributing to the broader field of model interpretability and secure AI deployment.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Mar 2025.

Builds on

17 of 31 references.

References · 17

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,818
  3. 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,346
  4. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
  5. 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,114
  6. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
  7. 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,279
  8. 2017Crowdsourcing Multiple Choice Science Questionscited by 742
  9. 2023DecodingTrust: A Comprehensive Assessment of Trustworthiness in GPT Modelscited by 505
  10. 2024Sparse Feature Circuits: Discovering and Editing Interpretable Causal Graphs in Language Modelscited by 412
  11. 2023Analyzing Leakage of Personally Identifiable Information in Language Modelscited by 278
  12. 2013k-Sparse Autoencoderscited by 209
5 more
  1. 2024Improving Dictionary Learning with Gated Sparse Autoencoderscited by 171
  2. 2024Learnable Privacy Neurons Localization in Language Modelscited by 26
  3. 2024PII-Compass: Guiding LLM training data extraction prompts towards the target PII via groundingcited by 22
  4. 2024Sparse Autoencoders Enable Scalable and Reliable Circuit Identification in Language Modelscited by 13
  5. 2024Privacy-preserving Fine-tuning of Large Language Models through Flatnesscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 3.

6 papers.