mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

R.U.Psycho? Robust Unified Psychometric Testing of Language Models

arXiv 2503.10229 ↗First posted 13 Mar 2025cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Generative language models are increasingly being subjected to psychometric questionnaires intended for human testing, in efforts to establish their traits, as benchmarks for alignment, or to simulate participants in social science experiments. While this growing body of work sheds light on the likeness of model responses to those of humans, concerns are warranted regarding the rigour and reproducibility with which these experiments may be conducted. Instabilities in model outputs, sensitivity to prompt design, parameter settings, and a large number of available model versions increase documentation requirements. Consequently, generalization of findings is often complex and reproducibility is far from guaranteed. In this paper, we present R.U.Psycho, a framework for designing and running robust and reproducible psychometric experiments on generative language models that requires limited coding expertise. We demonstrate the capability of our framework on a variety of psychometric questionnaires, which lend support to prior findings in the literature. R.U.Psycho is available as a Python package at https://github.com/julianschelb/rupsycho.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Mar 2025.

Builds on

26 of 55 references.

References · 26

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,486
  2. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,840
  3. 2021Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivitycited by 1,126
  4. 2022Out of One, Many: Using Language Models to Simulate Human Samplescited by 747
  5. 2023A Prompt Pattern Catalog to Enhance Prompt Engineering with ChatGPTcited by 616
  6. 2022Using Large Language Models to Simulate Multiple Humans and Replicate Human Subject Studiescited by 512
  7. 2023Zephyr: Direct Distillation of LM Alignmentcited by 502
  8. 2022Using cognitive psychology to understand GPT-3cited by 395
  9. 2023Can AI-Generated Text be Reliably Detected?cited by 383
  10. 2023Large Language Models Fail on Trivial Alterations to Theory-of-Mind Taskscited by 290
  11. 2022Data Contamination: From Memorization to Exploitationcited by 236
  12. 2024Leak, Cheat, Repeat: Data Contamination and Evaluation Malpractices in Closed-Source LLMscited by 227
14 more
  1. 2023Bias Runs Deep: Implicit Reasoning Biases in Persona-Assigned LLMscited by 196
  2. 2024Quantifying the Persona Effect in LLM Simulationscited by 166
  3. 2024Political Compass or Spinning Arrow? Towards More Meaningful Evaluations for Values and Opinions in Large Language Modelscited by 162
  4. 2024Aya 23: Open Weight Releases to Further Multilingual Progresscited by 123
  5. 2024GTBench: Uncovering the Strategic Reasoning Limitations of LLMs via Game-Theoretic Evaluationscited by 118
  6. 2022Who is GPT-3? An Exploration of Personality, Values and Demographicscited by 112
  7. 2023Generative Language Models Exhibit Social Identity Biasescited by 107
  8. 2022Human heuristics for AI-generated language are flawedcited by 105
  9. 2023Artificial Artificial Artificial Intelligence: Crowd Workers Widely Use Large Language Models for Text Production Taskscited by 103
  10. 2024"My Answer is C": First-Token Probabilities Do Not Match Text Answers in Instruction-Tuned Language Modelscited by 66
  11. 2023You don't need a personality test to know these models are unreliable: Assessing the Reliability of Large Language Models on Psychometric Instrumentscited by 48
  12. 2024Limited Ability of LLMs to Simulate Human Psychological Behaviours: a Psychometric Analysiscited by 30
  13. 2024Modeling Human Subjectivity in LLMs Using Explicit and Implicit Human Factors in Personascited by 23
  14. 2022Mind Your Bias: A Critical Review of Bias Detection Methods for Contextual Language Modelscited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.