Uncertainty-aware Long-tailed Weights Model the Utility of Pseudo-labels for Semi-supervised Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Current Semi-supervised Learning (SSL) adopts the pseudo-labeling strategy and further filters pseudo-labels based on confidence thresholds. However, this mechanism has notable drawbacks: 1) setting the reasonable threshold is an open problem which significantly influences the selection of the high-quality pseudo-labels; and 2) deep models often exhibit the over-confidence phenomenon which makes the confidence value an unreliable indicator for assessing the quality of pseudo-labels due to the scarcity of labeled data. In this paper, we propose an Uncertainty-aware Ensemble Structure (UES) to assess the utility of pseudo-labels for unlabeled samples. We further model the utility of pseudo-labels as long-tailed weights to avoid the open problem of setting the threshold. Concretely, the advantage of the long-tailed weights ensures that even unreliable pseudo-labels still contribute to enhancing the model's robustness. Besides, UES is lightweight and architecture-agnostic, easily extending to various computer vision tasks, including classification and regression. Experimental results demonstrate that combining the proposed method with DualPose leads to a 3.47% improvement in Percentage of Correct Keypoints (PCK) on the Sniffing dataset with 100 data points (30 labeled), a 7.29% improvement in PCK on the FLIC dataset with 100 data points (50 labeled), and a 3.91% improvement in PCK on the LSP dataset with 200 data points (100 labeled). Furthermore, when combined with FixMatch, the proposed method achieves a 0.2% accuracy improvement on the CIFAR-10 dataset with 40 labeled data points and a 0.26% accuracy improvement on the CIFAR-100 dataset with 400 labeled data points.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Mar 2025.
Builds on
16 of 34 references.
References · 16
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
- 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,085
- 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,391
- 2016Stacked Hourglass Networks for Human Pose Estimationcited by 915
- 2021FlexMatch: Boosting Semi-Supervised Learning with Curriculum Pseudo Labelingcited by 540
- 2019Semi-supervised Domain Adaptation via Minimax Entropycited by 335
- 2021In Defense of Pseudo-Labeling: An Uncertainty-Aware Pseudo-label Selection Framework for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 301
- 2022FreeMatch: Self-adaptive Thresholding for Semi-supervised Learningcited by 232
- 2020Uncertainty Aware Semi-Supervised Learning on Graph Datacited by 95
- 2019Mitigating Overfitting in Supervised Classification from Two Unlabeled Datasets: A Consistent Risk Correction Approachcited by 29
- 2020An Empirical Study of the Collapsing Problem in Semi-Supervised 2D Human Pose Estimationcited by 21
4 more
- 2023FlatMatch: Bridging Labeled Data and Unlabeled Data with Cross-Sharpness for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 20
- 2021Combating Noise: Semi-supervised Learning by Region Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 18
- 2022MaxMatch: Semi-Supervised Learning with Worst-Case Consistencycited by 9
- 2024A Channel-ensemble Approach: Unbiased and Low-variance Pseudo-labels is Critical for Semi-supervised Classificationcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.