Learning Rate Annealing Improves Tuning Robustness in Stochastic Optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The learning rate in stochastic gradient methods is a critical hyperparameter that is notoriously costly to tune via standard grid search, especially for training modern large-scale models with billions of parameters. We identify a theoretical advantage of learning rate annealing schemes that decay the learning rate to zero at a polynomial rate, such as the widely-used cosine schedule, by demonstrating their increased robustness to initial parameter misspecification due to a coarse grid search. We present an analysis in a stochastic convex optimization setup demonstrating that the convergence rate of stochastic gradient descent with annealed schedules depends sublinearly on the multiplicative misspecification factor ρ (i.e., the grid resolution), achieving a rate of O(ρ1/(2p+1)/√T) where p is the degree of polynomial decay and T is the number of steps. This is in contrast to the O(ρ/√T) rate obtained under the inverse-square-root and fixed stepsize schedules, which depend linearly on ρ. Experiments confirm the increased robustness compared to tuning with a fixed stepsize, that has significant implications for the computational overhead of hyperparameter search in practical training scenarios.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Mar 2025.
Builds on
27 of 40 references.
References · 27
- 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
- 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
- 2019On the Convergence of Adam and Beyondcited by 834
- 2024MiniCPM: Unveiling the Potential of Small Language Models with Scalable Training Strategiescited by 694
- 2015Cyclical Learning Rates for Training Neural Networkscited by 627
- 2024The Road Less Scheduledcited by 158
- 2016Coin Betting and Parameter-Free Online Learningcited by 131
- 2023Prodigy: An Expeditiously Adaptive Parameter-Free Learnercited by 129
- 2018Black-Box Reductions for Parameter-free Online Learning in Banach Spacescited by 124
- 2023Learning-Rate-Free Learning by D-Adaptationcited by 113
- 2023DoG is SGD's Best Friend: A Parameter-Free Dynamic Step Size Schedulecited by 85
- 2019The Step Decay Schedule: A Near Optimal, Geometrically Decaying Learning Rate Procedure For Least Squarescited by 67
15 more
- 2022The Power of Adaptivity in SGD: Self-Tuning Step Sizes with Unbounded Gradients and Affine Variancecited by 60
- 2019UniXGrad: A Universal, Adaptive Algorithm with Optimal Guarantees for Constrained Optimizationcited by 56
- 2022Making SGD Parameter-Freecited by 50
- 2023High Probability Convergence of Stochastic Gradient Methodscited by 48
- 2023Optimal Linear Decay Learning Rate Schedules and Further Refinementscited by 41
- 2022High Probability Bounds for a Class of Nonconvex Algorithms with AdaGrad Stepsizecited by 40
- 2021Last Iterate Risk Bounds of SGD with Decaying Stepsize for Overparameterized Linear Regressioncited by 37
- 2020A new regret analysis for Adam-type algorithmscited by 35
- 2023Revisiting the Last-Iterate Convergence of Stochastic Gradient Methodscited by 35
- 2023SGD with AdaGrad Stepsizes: Full Adaptivity with High Probability to Unknown Parameters, Unbounded Gradients and Affine Variancecited by 30
- 2021Parameter-free Stochastic Optimization of Variationally Coherent Functionscited by 27
- 2020A Second look at Exponential and Cosine Step Sizes: Simplicity, Adaptivity, and Performancecited by 26
- 2023Exact convergence rate of the last iterate in subgradient methodscited by 24
- 2019On the Convergence Proof of AMSGrad and a New Versioncited by 21
- 2021Super-Acceleration with Cyclical Step-sizescited by 14
Built on by
Not cited yet.