mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning Rate Annealing Improves Tuning Robustness in Stochastic Optimization

arXiv 2503.09411 ↗First posted 12 Mar 2025cs.LG math.OC stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The learning rate in stochastic gradient methods is a critical hyperparameter that is notoriously costly to tune via standard grid search, especially for training modern large-scale models with billions of parameters. We identify a theoretical advantage of learning rate annealing schemes that decay the learning rate to zero at a polynomial rate, such as the widely-used cosine schedule, by demonstrating their increased robustness to initial parameter misspecification due to a coarse grid search. We present an analysis in a stochastic convex optimization setup demonstrating that the convergence rate of stochastic gradient descent with annealed schedules depends sublinearly on the multiplicative misspecification factor ρ (i.e., the grid resolution), achieving a rate of O(ρ1/(2p+1)/√T) where p is the degree of polynomial decay and T is the number of steps. This is in contrast to the O(ρ/√T) rate obtained under the inverse-square-root and fixed stepsize schedules, which depend linearly on ρ. Experiments confirm the increased robustness compared to tuning with a fixed stepsize, that has significant implications for the computational overhead of hyperparameter search in practical training scenarios.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Mar 2025.

Builds on

27 of 40 references.

References · 27

  1. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
  2. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
  3. 2019On the Convergence of Adam and Beyondcited by 834
  4. 2024MiniCPM: Unveiling the Potential of Small Language Models with Scalable Training Strategiescited by 694
  5. 2015Cyclical Learning Rates for Training Neural Networkscited by 627
  6. 2024The Road Less Scheduledcited by 158
  7. 2016Coin Betting and Parameter-Free Online Learningcited by 131
  8. 2023Prodigy: An Expeditiously Adaptive Parameter-Free Learnercited by 129
  9. 2018Black-Box Reductions for Parameter-free Online Learning in Banach Spacescited by 124
  10. 2023Learning-Rate-Free Learning by D-Adaptationcited by 113
  11. 2023DoG is SGD's Best Friend: A Parameter-Free Dynamic Step Size Schedulecited by 85
  12. 2019The Step Decay Schedule: A Near Optimal, Geometrically Decaying Learning Rate Procedure For Least Squarescited by 67
15 more
  1. 2022The Power of Adaptivity in SGD: Self-Tuning Step Sizes with Unbounded Gradients and Affine Variancecited by 60
  2. 2019UniXGrad: A Universal, Adaptive Algorithm with Optimal Guarantees for Constrained Optimizationcited by 56
  3. 2022Making SGD Parameter-Freecited by 50
  4. 2023High Probability Convergence of Stochastic Gradient Methodscited by 48
  5. 2023Optimal Linear Decay Learning Rate Schedules and Further Refinementscited by 41
  6. 2022High Probability Bounds for a Class of Nonconvex Algorithms with AdaGrad Stepsizecited by 40
  7. 2021Last Iterate Risk Bounds of SGD with Decaying Stepsize for Overparameterized Linear Regressioncited by 37
  8. 2020A new regret analysis for Adam-type algorithmscited by 35
  9. 2023Revisiting the Last-Iterate Convergence of Stochastic Gradient Methodscited by 35
  10. 2023SGD with AdaGrad Stepsizes: Full Adaptivity with High Probability to Unknown Parameters, Unbounded Gradients and Affine Variancecited by 30
  11. 2021Parameter-free Stochastic Optimization of Variationally Coherent Functionscited by 27
  12. 2020A Second look at Exponential and Cosine Step Sizes: Simplicity, Adaptivity, and Performancecited by 26
  13. 2023Exact convergence rate of the last iterate in subgradient methodscited by 24
  14. 2019On the Convergence Proof of AMSGrad and a New Versioncited by 21
  15. 2021Super-Acceleration with Cyclical Step-sizescited by 14

Built on by

Not cited yet.