Rule-Guided Reinforcement Learning Policy Evaluation and Improvement
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider the challenging problem of using domain knowledge to improve deep reinforcement learning policies. To this end, we propose LEGIBLE, a novel approach, following a multi-step process, which starts by mining rules from a deep RL policy, constituting a partially symbolic representation. These rules describe which decisions the RL policy makes and which it avoids making. In the second step, we generalize the mined rules using domain knowledge expressed as metamorphic relations. We adapt these relations from software testing to RL to specify expected changes of actions in response to changes in observations. The third step is evaluating generalized rules to determine which generalizations improve performance when enforced. These improvements show weaknesses in the policy, where it has not learned the general rules and thus can be improved by rule guidance. LEGIBLE supported by metamorphic relations provides a principled way of expressing and enforcing domain knowledge about RL environments. We show the efficacy of our approach by demonstrating that it effectively finds weaknesses, accompanied by explanations of these weaknesses, in eleven RL environments and by showcasing that guiding policy execution with rules improves performance w.r.t. gained reward.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Mar 2025.
Builds on
20 of 49 references.
References · 20
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,704
- 2017Safe Reinforcement Learning via Shieldingcited by 427
- 2015Doubly Robust Off-policy Value Evaluation for Reinforcement Learningcited by 337
- 2019Machine Learning Testing: Survey, Landscapes and Horizonscited by 213
- 2018Verifiable Reinforcement Learning via Policy Extractioncited by 176
- 2019Neural Logic Machinescited by 144
- 2022A Review of Off-Policy Evaluation in Reinforcement Learningcited by 92
- 2018Relational Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 72
- 2019Neural Logic Reinforcement Learningcited by 53
8 more
- 2023Interpretable and Explainable Logical Policies via Neurally Guided Symbolic Abstractioncited by 45
- 2021Universal Off-Policy Evaluationcited by 43
- 2018Identifying Implementation Bugs in Machine Learning based Image Classifiers using Metamorphic Testingcited by 30
- 2020TripleTree: A Versatile Interpretable Representation of Black Box Agents and their Environmentscited by 18
- 2022Search-Based Testing of Reinforcement Learningcited by 12
- 2022MAVIPER: Learning Decision Tree Policies for Interpretable Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 12
- 2022A Search-Based Testing Approach for Deep Reinforcement Learning Agentscited by 12
- 2023Testing of Deep Reinforcement Learning Agents with Surrogate Modelscited by 12
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026Explainably Safe Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2026Phase-Aware Guidance Injection for Recurrent MAPPO in Assembly-Line Disruption Recoverycited by 0
- 2026ORCAID: Oblique Rule-Based Continuous-Action Interpretation for Deep RL Policiescited by 0
- 2026Evaluating RL Explainability Methods by How Much They Help Fix Bugs in Agentscited by 0
- 2026Evaluating RL Explainability Methods by How Much They Help Fix Bugs in Agents18 Aug 2026
- 2026ORCAID: Oblique Rule-Based Continuous-Action Interpretation for Deep RL Policies8 Jul 2026
- 2026Phase-Aware Guidance Injection for Recurrent MAPPO in Assembly-Line Disruption Recovery15 Jun 2026
- 2026Explainably Safe Reinforcement Learning3 Jun 2026