Leveraging Retrieval Augmented Generative LLMs For Automated Metadata Description Generation to Enhance Data Catalogs
On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → RAG pipeline design and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
Data catalogs serve as repositories for organizing and accessing diverse collection of data assets, but their effectiveness hinges on the ease with which business users can look-up relevant content. Unfortunately, many data catalogs within organizations suffer from limited searchability due to inadequate metadata like asset descriptions. Hence, there is a need of content generation solution to enrich and curate metadata in a scalable way. This paper explores the challenges associated with metadata creation and proposes a unique prompt enrichment idea of leveraging existing metadata content using retrieval based few-shot technique tied with generative large language models (LLM). The literature also considers finetuning an LLM on existing content and studies the behavior of few-shot pretrained LLM (Llama, GPT3.5) vis-`a-vis few-shot finetuned LLM (Llama2-7b) by evaluating their performance based on accuracy, factual grounding, and toxicity. Our preliminary results exhibit more than 80% Rouge-1 F1 for the generated content. This implied 87%- 88% of instances accepted as is or curated with minor edits by data stewards. By automatically generating descriptions for tables and columns in most accurate way, the research attempts to provide an overall framework for enterprises to effectively scale metadata curation and enrich its data catalog thereby vastly improving the data catalog searchability and overall usability.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RAG pipeline design and evaluation, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 8 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Mar 2025.
Builds on
8 of 32 references.
References · 8
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
- 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,418
- 2024The Faiss librarycited by 376
- 2023AlignScore: Evaluating Factual Consistency with a Unified Alignment Functioncited by 288
- 2023Column Type Annotation using ChatGPTcited by 19
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) and Beyond: A Comprehensive Survey on How to Make your LLMs use External Data More Wisely
- 2025A Systematic Framework for Enterprise Knowledge Retrieval: Leveraging LLM-Generated Metadata to Enhance RAG Systems
- 2023A Study on the Implementation of Generative AI Services Using an Enterprise Data-Based LLM Application Architecture
- 2026Beyond Pipelines: A Fundamental Study on the Rise of Generative-Retrieval Architectures in Web Research
- 2025When Retrieval Succeeds and Fails: Rethinking Retrieval-Augmented Generation for LLMs
- 2024Deploying Large Language Models With Retrieval Augmented Generation
- 2024Developing Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) based LLM Systems from PDFs: An Experience Report
- 2024RAG Foundry: A Framework for Enhancing LLMs for Retrieval Augmented Generation