mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

LightPlanner: Unleashing the Reasoning Capabilities of Lightweight Large Language Models in Task Planning

arXiv 2503.08508 ↗First posted 11 Mar 2025cs.ROcited by 2

On the map: LLM reasoning → Spatial and embodied reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

In recent years, lightweight large language models (LLMs) have garnered significant attention in the robotics field due to their low computational resource requirements and suitability for edge deployment. However, in task planning -- particularly for complex tasks that involve dynamic semantic logic reasoning -- lightweight LLMs have underperformed. To address this limitation, we propose a novel task planner, LightPlanner, which enhances the performance of lightweight LLMs in complex task planning by fully leveraging their reasoning capabilities. Unlike conventional planners that use fixed skill templates, LightPlanner controls robot actions via parameterized function calls, dynamically generating parameter values. This approach allows for fine-grained skill control and improves task planning success rates in complex scenarios. Furthermore, we introduce hierarchical deep reasoning. Before generating each action decision step, LightPlanner thoroughly considers three levels: action execution (feedback verification), semantic parsing (goal consistency verification), and parameter generation (parameter validity verification). This ensures the correctness of subsequent action controls. Additionally, we incorporate a memory module to store historical actions, thereby reducing context length and enhancing planning efficiency for long-term tasks. We train the LightPlanner-1.5B model on our LightPlan-40k dataset, which comprises 40,000 action controls across tasks with 2 to 13 action steps. Experiments demonstrate that our model achieves the highest task success rate despite having the smallest number of parameters. In tasks involving spatial semantic reasoning, the success rate exceeds that of ReAct by 14.9 percent. Moreover, we demonstrate LightPlanner's potential to operate on edge devices.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 17 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Mar 2025.

Builds on

17 of 36 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2022Inner Monologue: Embodied Reasoning through Planning with Language Models12 Jul

Other references · 16

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  3. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  4. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
  5. 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,302
  6. 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,076
  7. 2023PaLM-E: An Embodied Multimodal Language Modelcited by 2,037
  8. 2025s1: Simple test-time scalingcited by 1,311
  9. 2022GLM-130B: An Open Bilingual Pre-trained Modelcited by 837
  10. 2023Foundation Models in Robotics: Applications, Challenges, and the Futurecited by 212
  11. 2023Look Before You Leap: Unveiling the Power of GPT-4V in Robotic Vision-Language Planningcited by 161
  12. 2023Foundation Models for Decision Making: Problems, Methods, and Opportunitiescited by 160
4 more
  1. 2024Closed-Loop Open-Vocabulary Mobile Manipulation with GPT-4Vcited by 40
  2. 2024MLDT: Multi-Level Decomposition for Complex Long-Horizon Robotic Task Planning with Open-Source Large Language Modelcited by 15
  3. 2024DaDu-Corki: Algorithm-Architecture Co-Design for Embodied AI-powered Robotic Manipulationcited by 12
  4. 2024InteLiPlan: An Interactive Lightweight LLM-Based Planner for Domestic Robot Autonomycited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Nl2Hltl2Plan: Scaling Up Natural Language Understanding for Multi-Robots Through Hierarchical Temporal Logic Task Representation
  2. 2025A Systematic Study of Large Language Models for Task and Motion Planning With PDDLStream
  3. 2026GAVEL: Graph World Models for Verified and Efficient Long-Horizon LLM Task Planning
  4. 2025Combining Large Language Models and Symbolic Reasoning for Multi-Robot Temporal Planning through Explainable Knowledge Bases
  5. 2025Vision-Language-Policy Model for Dynamic Robot Task Planning
  6. 2025Can LLM-Reasoning Models Replace Classical Planning? A Benchmark Study
  7. 2024ConceptAgent: LLM-Driven Precondition Grounding and Tree Search for Robust Task Planning and Execution
  8. 2025T3 Planner: A Self-Correcting LLM Framework for Robotic Motion Planning with Temporal Logic