Securing External Deeper-than-black-box GPAI Evaluations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper examines the critical challenges and potential solutions for conducting secure and effective external evaluations of general-purpose AI (GPAI) models. With the exponential growth in size, capability, reach and accompanying risk of these models, ensuring accountability, safety, and public trust requires frameworks that go beyond traditional black-box methods. The discussion begins with an analysis of the need for deeper-than-black-box evaluations (Section I), emphasizing the importance of understanding model internals to uncover latent risks and ensure compliance with ethical and regulatory standards. Building on this foundation, Section II addresses the security considerations of remote evaluations, outlining the threat landscape, technical solutions, and safeguards necessary to protect both evaluators and proprietary model data. Finally, Section III synthesizes these insights into actionable recommendations and future directions, aiming to establish a robust, scalable, and transparent framework for external assessments in GPAI governance.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 Mar 2025.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.
- 2025Incident Analysis for AI Agentscited by 5
- 2026AI Sandboxes: A Threat Model, Taxonomy, and Measurement Frameworkcited by 0
- 2026AI Sandboxes: A Threat Model, Taxonomy, and Measurement Framework16 Jun 2026
- 2025Incident Analysis for AI Agents19 Aug 2025