BTFL: A Bayesian-based Test-Time Generalization Method for Internal and External Data Distributions in Federated learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated Learning (FL) enables multiple clients to collaboratively develop a global model while maintaining data privacy. However, online FL deployment faces challenges due to distribution shifts and evolving test samples. Personalized Federated Learning (PFL) tailors the global model to individual client distributions, but struggles with Out-Of-Distribution (OOD) samples during testing, leading to performance degradation. In real-world scenarios, balancing personalization and generalization during online testing is crucial and existing methods primarily focus on training-phase generalization. To address the test-time trade-off, we introduce a new scenario: Test-time Generalization for Internal and External Distributions in Federated Learning (TGFL), which evaluates adaptability under Internal Distribution (IND) and External Distribution (EXD). We propose BTFL, a Bayesian-based test-time generalization method for TGFL, which balances generalization and personalization at the sample level during testing. BTFL employs a two-head architecture to store local and global knowledge, interpolating predictions via a dual-Bayesian framework that considers both historical test data and current sample characteristics with theoretical guarantee and faster speed. Our experiments demonstrate that BTFL achieves improved performance across various datasets and models with less time cost. The source codes are made publicly available at https://github.com/ZhouYuCS/BTFL .
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Mar 2025.
Builds on
27 of 55 references.
References · 27
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2018Group Normalizationcited by 1,524
- 2017Deep Hashing Network for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 1,188
- 2021Robust fine-tuning of zero-shot modelscited by 797
- 2020Bayesian Deep Learning and a Probabilistic Perspective of Generalizationcited by 480
- 2023Finite Scalar Quantization: VQ-VAE Made Simplecited by 440
- 2019Bayesian Nonparametric Federated Learning of Neural Networkscited by 387
- 2017A Downsampled Variant of ImageNet as an Alternative to the CIFAR datasetscited by 377
- 2021MEMO: Test Time Robustness via Adaptation and Augmentationcited by 377
- 2019The Non-IID Data Quagmire of Decentralized Machine Learningcited by 305
15 more
- 2021Escaping the Big Data Paradigm with Compact Transformerscited by 264
- 2018Do CIFAR-10 Classifiers Generalize to CIFAR-10?cited by 200
- 2020FedBE: Making Bayesian Model Ensemble Applicable to Federated Learningcited by 176
- 2022Generalized Federated Learning via Sharpness Aware Minimizationcited by 144
- 2019Regularized Learning for Domain Adaptation under Label Shiftscited by 120
- 2024Entropy is not Enough for Test-Time Adaptation: From the Perspective of Disentangled Factorscited by 106
- 2020Robust Federated Learning: The Case of Affine Distribution Shiftscited by 102
- 2018Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Surface Variationscited by 99
- 2022Improving Generalization in Federated Learning by Seeking Flat Minimacited by 98
- 2023Recent Advances on Federated Learning: A Systematic Surveycited by 41
- 2022Test-Time Robust Personalization for Federated Learningcited by 39
- 2023Adaptive Test-Time Personalization for Federated Learningcited by 23
- 2023Beyond Deep Ensembles: A Large-Scale Evaluation of Bayesian Deep Learning under Distribution Shiftcited by 20
- 2021PFA: Privacy-preserving Federated Adaptation for Effective Model Personalizationcited by 18
- 2018The Beta-Bernoulli process and algebraic effectscited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.