MAD-MAX: Modular And Diverse Malicious Attack MiXtures for Automated LLM Red Teaming
On the map: LLM safety and security → Prompt injection and agent security
Abstract (arXiv)
With LLM usage rapidly increasing, their vulnerability to jailbreaks that create harmful outputs are a major security risk. As new jailbreaking strategies emerge and models are changed by fine-tuning, continuous testing for security vulnerabilities is necessary. Existing Red Teaming methods fall short in cost efficiency, attack success rate, attack diversity, or extensibility as new attack types emerge. We address these challenges with Modular And Diverse Malicious Attack MiXtures (MAD-MAX) for Automated LLM Red Teaming. MAD-MAX uses automatic assignment of attack strategies into relevant attack clusters, chooses the most relevant clusters for a malicious goal, and then combines strategies from the selected clusters to achieve diverse novel attacks with high attack success rates. MAD-MAX further merges promising attacks together at each iteration of Red Teaming to boost performance and introduces a similarity filter to prune out similar attacks for increased cost efficiency. The MAD-MAX approach is designed to be easily extensible with newly discovered attack strategies and outperforms the prominent Red Teaming method Tree of Attacks with Pruning (TAP) significantly in terms of Attack Success Rate (ASR) and queries needed to achieve jailbreaks. MAD-MAX jailbreaks 97% of malicious goals in our benchmarks on GPT-4o and Gemini-Pro compared to TAP with 66%. MAD-MAX does so with only 10.9 average queries to the target LLM compared to TAP with 23.3. WARNING: This paper contains contents which are offensive in nature.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt injection and agent security, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 12 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Mar 2025.
Builds on
12 of 16 references.
Closest ancestors · 5
Same direction, newest first
- 2024PyRIT: A Framework for Security Risk Identification and Red Teaming in Generative AI System1 Oct
- 2024RedAgent: Red Teaming Large Language Models with Context-aware Autonomous Language Agent23 Jul
- 2024Curiosity-driven Red-teaming for Large Language Models29 Feb
- 2024Rainbow Teaming: Open-Ended Generation of Diverse Adversarial Prompts26 Feb
- 2023From ChatGPT to ThreatGPT: Impact of Generative AI in Cybersecurity and Privacy3 Jul
Other references · 7
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2023Jailbreaking Black Box Large Language Models in Twenty Queriescited by 1,326
- 2023Tree of Attacks: Jailbreaking Black-Box LLMs Automaticallycited by 619
- 2024How Johnny Can Persuade LLMs to Jailbreak Them: Rethinking Persuasion to Challenge AI Safety by Humanizing LLMscited by 533
- 2023Toxicity in ChatGPT: Analyzing Persona-assigned Language Modelscited by 356
- 2024Improved Techniques for Optimization-Based Jailbreaking on Large Language Modelscited by 98
- 2024Improved Few-Shot Jailbreaking Can Circumvent Aligned Language Models and Their Defensescited by 68
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.