mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Benchmarking Dynamic SLO Compliance in Distributed Computing Continuum Systems

arXiv 2503.03274 ↗First posted 5 Mar 2025cs.DC cs.AI cs.LGcited by 6

On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → RL for energy, networks and operations

Abstract (arXiv)

Ensuring Service Level Objectives (SLOs) in large-scale architectures, such as Distributed Computing Continuum Systems (DCCS), is challenging due to their heterogeneous nature and varying service requirements across different devices and applications. Additionally, unpredictable workloads and resource limitations lead to fluctuating performance and violated SLOs. To improve SLO compliance in DCCS, one possibility is to apply machine learning; however, the design choices are often left to the developer. To that extent, we provide a benchmark of Active Inference -- an emerging method from neuroscience -- against three established reinforcement learning algorithms (Deep Q-Network, Advantage Actor-Critic, and Proximal Policy Optimization). We consider a realistic DCCS use case: an edge device running a video conferencing application alongside a WebSocket server streaming videos. Using one of the respective algorithms, we continuously monitor key performance metrics, such as latency and bandwidth usage, to dynamically adjust parameters -- including the number of streams, frame rate, and resolution -- to optimize service quality and user experience. To test algorithms' adaptability to constant system changes, we simulate dynamically changing SLOs and both instant and gradual data-shift scenarios, such as network bandwidth limitations and fluctuating device thermal states. Although the evaluated algorithms all showed advantages and limitations, our findings demonstrate that Active Inference is a promising approach for ensuring SLO compliance in DCCS, offering lower memory usage, stable CPU utilization, and fast convergence.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RL for energy, networks and operations, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 7 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Mar 2025.

Builds on

7 of 38 references.

References · 7

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  2. 2016Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 2,258
  3. 2020FIRM: An Intelligent Fine-Grained Resource Management Framework for SLO-Oriented Microservicescited by 41
  4. 2022Autonomy and Intelligence in the Computing Continuum: Challenges, Enablers, and Future Directions for Orchestrationcited by 12
  5. 2023Equilibrium in the Computing Continuum through Active Inferencecited by 9
  6. 2024Adaptive Stream Processing on Edge Devices through Active Inferencecited by 6
  7. 2025Towards smart and adaptive agents for active sensing on edge devicescited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

6 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Distributed Intelligence in the Computing Continuum with Active Inference
  2. 2025SLA-MORL: SLA-Aware Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning for HPC Resource Optimization
  3. 2026Brief Announcement: Generative Markov Model for Distributed Computing Systems
  4. 2026Decentralized Task Scheduling in Distributed Systems: A Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach
  5. 2026When Does Deep RL Beat Calibrated Baselines? A Benchmark Study on Adaptive Resource Control
  6. 2026Adaptive Inference Batching using Policy Gradients
  7. 2026CALF: Communication-Aware Learning Framework for Distributed Reinforcement Learning
  8. 2026Incentives and Evidence in Learned Service Orchestration