Inductive randomness predictors: beyond conformal
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper introduces inductive randomness predictors, which form a proper superset of inductive conformal predictors but have the same principal property of validity under the assumption of randomness (i.e., of IID data). It turns out that every non-trivial inductive conformal predictor is strictly dominated by an inductive randomness predictor, although the improvement is not great, at most a factor of e≈2.72 in the case of e-prediction. The dominating inductive randomness predictors are more complicated and more difficult to compute; besides, an improvement by a factor of e is rare. Therefore, this paper does not suggest replacing inductive conformal predictors by inductive randomness predictors and only calls for a more detailed study of the latter.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Mar 2025.
Builds on
6 of 21 references.
References · 6
- 2013Learning by Transductioncited by 120
- 2020Conformal e-predictioncited by 20
- 2025Universality of conformal prediction under the assumption of randomnesscited by 2
- 2014An error analysis for polynomial optimization over the simplex based on the multivariate hypergeometric distributioncited by 1
- 2015On the convergence rate of grid search for polynomial optimization over the simplexcited by 1
- 2017Test statistics and p-valuescited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.