mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Inductive randomness predictors: beyond conformal

arXiv 2503.02803 ↗First posted 4 Mar 2025cs.LG stat.MEcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper introduces inductive randomness predictors, which form a proper superset of inductive conformal predictors but have the same principal property of validity under the assumption of randomness (i.e., of IID data). It turns out that every non-trivial inductive conformal predictor is strictly dominated by an inductive randomness predictor, although the improvement is not great, at most a factor of e≈2.72 in the case of e-prediction. The dominating inductive randomness predictors are more complicated and more difficult to compute; besides, an improvement by a factor of e is rare. Therefore, this paper does not suggest replacing inductive conformal predictors by inductive randomness predictors and only calls for a more detailed study of the latter.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Mar 2025.

Builds on

6 of 21 references.

References · 6

  1. 2013Learning by Transductioncited by 120
  2. 2020Conformal e-predictioncited by 20
  3. 2025Universality of conformal prediction under the assumption of randomnesscited by 2
  4. 2014An error analysis for polynomial optimization over the simplex based on the multivariate hypergeometric distributioncited by 1
  5. 2015On the convergence rate of grid search for polynomial optimization over the simplexcited by 1
  6. 2017Test statistics and p-valuescited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.