mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

TMIQ: Quantifying Test and Measurement Domain Intelligence in Large Language Models

arXiv 2503.02123 ↗First posted 3 Mar 2025cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The Test and Measurement domain, known for its strict requirements for accuracy and efficiency, is increasingly adopting Generative AI technologies to enhance the performance of data analysis, automation, and decision-making processes. Among these, Large Language Models (LLMs) show significant promise for advancing automation and precision in testing. However, the evaluation of LLMs in this specialized area remains insufficiently explored. To address this gap, we introduce the Test and Measurement Intelligence Quotient (TMIQ), a benchmark designed to quantitatively assess LLMs across a wide range of electronic engineering tasks. TMIQ offers a comprehensive set of scenarios and metrics for detailed evaluation, including SCPI command matching accuracy, ranked response evaluation, Chain-of-Thought Reasoning (CoT), and the impact of output formatting variations required by LLMs on performance. In testing various LLMs, our findings indicate varying levels of proficiency, with exact SCPI command match accuracy ranging from around 56% to 73%, and ranked matching first-position scores achieving around 33% for the best-performing model. We also assess token usage, cost-efficiency, and response times, identifying trade-offs between accuracy and operational efficiency. Additionally, we present a command-line interface (CLI) tool that enables users to generate datasets using the same methodology, allowing for tailored assessments of LLMs. TMIQ and the CLI tool provide a rigorous, reproducible means of evaluating LLMs for production environments, facilitating continuous monitoring and identifying strengths and areas for improvement, and driving innovation in their selections for applications within the Test and Measurement industry.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Mar 2025.

Builds on

9 of 27 references.

References · 9

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  3. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  4. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  5. 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,758
  6. 2024When Benchmarks are Targets: Revealing the Sensitivity of Large Language Model Leaderboardscited by 134
  7. 2023Cognitive Overload: Jailbreaking Large Language Models with Overloaded Logical Thinkingcited by 78
  8. 2024Capabilities of Large Language Models in Control Engineering: A Benchmark Study on GPT-4, Claude 3 Opus, and Gemini 1.0 Ultracited by 36
  9. 2017A Brief Introduction to Machine Learning for Engineerscited by 20

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Challenges in Testing Large Language Model Based Software: A Faceted Taxonomy
  2. 2024TestAgent: Automatic Benchmarking and Exploratory Interaction for Evaluating LLMs in Vertical Domains
  3. 2024Large Language Model Evaluation Via Multi AI Agents: Preliminary results
  4. 2025Domain Specific Benchmarks for Evaluating Multimodal Large Language Models
  5. 2025CompassVerifier: A Unified and Robust Verifier for LLMs Evaluation and Outcome Reward
  6. 2026Can LLM Reasoning Be Trusted? A Comparative Study: Using Human Benchmarking on Statistical Tasks
  7. 2025STEM: Efficient Relative Capability Evaluation of LLMs through Structured Transition Samples
  8. 2025Computational Reasoning of Large Language Models