OIPR: Evaluation for Time-series Anomaly Detection Inspired by Operator Interest
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
With the growing adoption of time-series anomaly detection (TAD) technology, numerous studies have employed deep learning-based detectors to analyze time-series data in the fields of Internet services, industrial systems, and sensors. The selection and optimization of anomaly detectors strongly rely on the availability of an effective evaluation for TAD performance. Since anomalies in time-series data often manifest as a sequence of points, conventional metrics that solely consider the detection of individual points are inadequate. Existing TAD evaluators typically employ point-based or event-based metrics to capture the temporal context. However, point-based evaluators tend to overestimate detectors that excel only in detecting long anomalies, while event-based evaluators are susceptible to being misled by fragmented detection results. To address these limitations, we propose OIPR (Operator Interest-based Precision and Recall metrics), a novel TAD evaluator with area-based metrics. It models the process of operators receiving detector alarms and handling anomalies, utilizing area under the operator interest curve to evaluate TAD performance. Furthermore, we build a special scenario dataset to compare the characteristics of different evaluators. Through experiments conducted on the special scenario dataset and five real-world datasets, we demonstrate the remarkable performance of OIPR in extreme and complex scenarios. It achieves a balance between point and event perspectives, overcoming their primary limitations and offering applicability to broader situations.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Mar 2025.
Builds on
15 of 54 references.
References · 15
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2021Autoformer: Decomposition Transformers with Auto-Correlation for Long-Term Series Forecastingcited by 1,676
- 2022Are Transformers Effective for Time Series Forecasting?cited by 1,424
- 2022TimesNet: Temporal 2D-Variation Modeling for General Time Series Analysiscited by 1,058
- 2018Detecting Spacecraft Anomalies Using LSTMs and Nonparametric Dynamic Thresholdingcited by 410
- 2021Anomaly Transformer: Time Series Anomaly Detection with Association Discrepancycited by 394
- 2021Graph Neural Network-Based Anomaly Detection in Multivariate Time Seriescited by 301
- 2018Unsupervised Anomaly Detection via Variational Auto-Encoder for Seasonal KPIs in Web Applicationscited by 224
- 2021Towards a Rigorous Evaluation of Time-series Anomaly Detectioncited by 97
- 2015Evaluating Real-time Anomaly Detection Algorithms - the Numenta Anomaly Benchmarkcited by 88
- 2022Local Evaluation of Time Series Anomaly Detection Algorithmscited by 79
- 2018Precision and Recall for Time Seriescited by 67
3 more
- 2021Unsupervised Deep Anomaly Detection for Multi-Sensor Time-Series Signalscited by 41
- 2023Navigating the Metric Maze: A Taxonomy of Evaluation Metrics for Anomaly Detection in Time Seriescited by 24
- 2018Detecting Cyberattacks in Industrial Control Systems Using Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 23
Built on by
Not cited yet.