mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Variance reduction in output from generative AI

arXiv 2503.01033 ↗First posted 2 Mar 2025cs.CY cs.CLcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Generative AI models, such as ChatGPT, will increasingly replace humans in producing output for a variety of important tasks. While much prior work has mostly focused on the improvement in the average performance of generative AI models relative to humans' performance, much less attention has been paid to the significant reduction of variance in output produced by generative AI models. In this Perspective, we demonstrate that generative AI models are inherently prone to the phenomenon of "regression toward the mean" whereby variance in output tends to shrink relative to that in real-world distributions. We discuss potential social implications of this phenomenon across three levels-societal, group, and individual-and two dimensions-material and non-material. Finally, we discuss interventions to mitigate negative effects, considering the roles of both service providers and users. Overall, this Perspective aims to raise awareness of the importance of output variance in generative AI and to foster collaborative efforts to meet the challenges posed by the reduction of variance in output generated by AI models.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Mar 2025.

Builds on

25 of 48 references.

References · 25

  1. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  2. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  3. 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,603
  4. 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,537
  5. 2022Diffusion Models in Vision: A Surveycited by 1,008
  6. 2023Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 626
  7. 2021Persistent Anti-Muslim Bias in Large Language Modelscited by 376
  8. 2024Can LLMs Generate Novel Research Ideas? A Large-Scale Human Study with 100+ NLP Researcherscited by 348
  9. 2023ToolQA: A Dataset for LLM Question Answering with External Toolscited by 273
  10. 2022Easily Accessible Text-to-Image Generation Amplifies Demographic Stereotypes at Large Scalecited by 262
  11. 2023Evaluating Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 200
  12. 2023"Kelly is a Warm Person, Joseph is a Role Model": Gender Biases in LLM-Generated Reference Letterscited by 196
13 more
  1. 2023Gender bias and stereotypes in Large Language Modelscited by 185
  2. 2023Should ChatGPT be Biased? Challenges and Risks of Bias in Large Language Modelscited by 144
  3. 2019On the Use of ArXiv as a Datasetcited by 101
  4. 2023Better to Ask in English: Cross-Lingual Evaluation of Large Language Models for Healthcare Queriescited by 82
  5. 2024AI and the Problem of Knowledge Collapsecited by 34
  6. 2023LLMRec: Benchmarking Large Language Models on Recommendation Taskcited by 29
  7. 2024BertaQA: How Much Do Language Models Know About Local Culture?cited by 23
  8. 2024Bias in Generative AIcited by 19
  9. 2023Improving Cross-lingual Information Retrieval on Low-Resource Languages via Optimal Transport Distillationcited by 15
  10. 2024Bias and Volatility: A Statistical Framework for Evaluating Large Language Model's Stereotypes and the Associated Generation Inconsistencycited by 15
  11. 2024The LLM Effect: Are Humans Truly Using LLMs, or Are They Being Influenced By Them Instead?cited by 14
  12. 2024Generative Discrimination: What Happens When Generative AI Exhibits Bias, and What Can Be Done About Itcited by 7
  13. 2024Measuring Human Contribution in AI-Assisted Content Generationcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 5.

6 papers.