An Efficient and Uncertainty-aware Reinforcement Learning Framework for Quality Assurance in Extrusion Additive Manufacturing
On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → RL for energy, networks and operations
Abstract (arXiv)
Defects in extrusion additive manufacturing remain common despite its prevalent use. While numerous AI-driven approaches have been proposed to improve quality assurance, the inherently dynamic nature of the printing process poses persistent challenges. Regardless of how comprehensive the training dataset is, out-of-distribution data remains inevitable. Consequently, deterministic models often struggle to maintain robustness and, in some cases, fail entirely when deployed in new or slightly altered printing environments. This work introduces an agent that dynamically adjusts flow rate and temperature setpoints in real time, optimizing process control while addressing bottlenecks in training efficiency and uncertainty management. It integrates a vision-based uncertainty quantification module with a reinforcement learning controller, using probabilistic distributions to describe printing segments. While the underlying networks are deterministic, these evolving distributions introduce adaptability into the decision-making process. The vision system classifies material extrusion with a certain level of precision, generating corresponding distributions. A deep Q-learning controller interacts with a simulated environment calibrated to the vision system precision, allowing the agent to learn optimal actions while demonstrating appropriate hesitation when necessary. By executing asynchronous actions and applying progressively tightened elliptical reward shaping, the controller develops robust, adaptive control strategies that account for the coupling effects between process parameters. When deployed with zero-shot learning, the agent effectively bridges the sim-to-real gap, correcting mild and severe under- and over-extrusion reliably. Beyond extrusion additive manufacturing, this scalable framework enables practical AI-driven quality assurance across various additive manufacturing processes.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RL for energy, networks and operations, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 7 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Mar 2025.
Builds on
7 of 38 references.
References · 7
- 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,274
- 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,580
- 2016Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 2,258
- 2017The Effects of Memory Replay in Reinforcement Learningcited by 23
- 2021Thermal Control of Laser Powder Bed Fusion Using Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 12
- 2024In-situ process monitoring and adaptive quality enhancement in laser additive manufacturing: a critical reviewcited by 5
- 2022Closed-Loop Control of Direct Ink Writing via Reinforcement Learningcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024LLM-3D Print: Large Language Models To Monitor and Control 3D Printing
- 2026Multi-Head Attention-Based Feature Extractor Integration with Soft Actor-Critic for Porosity Prediction and Process Parameter Optimization in Additive Manufacturing
- 2024Deep Reinforcement Learning Based Toolpath Generation for Thermal Uniformity in Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process
- 2025In-Context-Learning-Assisted Quality Assessment Vision-Language Models for Metal Additive Manufacturing
- 2026Minimizing Material Waste in Additive Manufacturing through Online Reel Assignment ↗
- 2026Automated Data Engineering and Feature Selection for the Case Study of Warpage Detection in Fused Deposition Modeling
- 2025DRL-Based Injection Molding Process Parameter Optimization for Adaptive and Profitable Production
- 2025QA-VLM: Providing human-interpretable quality assessment for wire-feed laser additive manufacturing parts with Vision Language Models